Good question!! It is easy to trash talk and find fault with someone until you got to walk in their shoes!!
2006-09-25 05:32:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Caleb's Mom 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I wouldn't have been looking for an excuse to go into Iraq especially when I already had the perfect battleground in Afghanistan to hunt terrorist out in the boonies out of the cities where I could shoot at will without consequences. I wouldn't have passed that stupid tax cut for the super rich. I would have taxed the rich more and I wouldn't have dumbed down the environmental laws. the patriot act wouldn't have passed my desk either without serious revisions. I wouldn't talk down to other countries all the time as this president does it's obvious he's never lived outside the country for any length of time. I would have given a large tax break to the middle class and the poor. I would have tried to pass some form of national health care. I would most certainly have closed most if not all corporate welfare. I would have chosen people who had experience and talent to lead the various government agencies I wouldn't even care what party they were from, not political hacks and lackeys! That's liberalism and it sounds like you could use a strong dose of it!
2006-09-25 14:48:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by brian L 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I love and admire President Bush.
Liberals have NO real platform or agenda regarding the war on terror, I guess 9/11 didnt outrage them too much after all.
Liberals care about little other than embracing gays, ridiculing Christians, slaughtering unborn babies, kissing celebrity butt, burning American flags and Bibles, attacking Pro Life protestors AND turning it around to make it look like the Pro Life'rs are the violent persons, throwing pigs blood on anyone wearing fur or leather (which also honors their hypocracy, using dead animal blood to show outrage for someone wearing dead animal hide).......
They would have put their heads further up their poop shoots and initiated "peace talks" with terrorist nations who want to KILL US because we are AMERICANS, they hate the libs too, maybe more than the conservatives!!! What an irony!
2006-09-25 13:07:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Great question. I've been asking for days. The only thing they can do is hate Bush.
They all think the war in Iraq is like Vietnam. Big diff. Terrorists don't just let you walk away.
They are pro-choice like its pro-women. BS. Happy women don't have abortions (a truer quote than joelgt's above).
Be careful, their plan is to take our money and give it to someone else.
2006-09-25 12:46:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Just as I thought, nothing but ignorant answers. People hate Bush and say War for oil,that's hogwash, the war is because of September 11th. Some people say impeach Bush, for what, he's not the one getting blowjobss in the oval office like Clinton was.
People should know what they're talking about before they run around bashing the President of the United States.
2006-09-25 12:35:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by petitionboy 1
·
2⤊
3⤋
How's this, We wouldn't have invaded Iraq. Yet. We would be finishing the job in Afghanistan. When we had OBL surrounded in Tora Bora, my first question would have been How fast can we move in? NOT How fast can our allies move in? One of the first things I would have done would have to cut off his retreat to Pakistan.
We had the people and the supplies and the ability to catch him, but the Bush Administration wanted our Afghan Allies to do it. It took them 3 or 4 days to get in place, then another 2 days to begin the assault. If we hadn't waited for our "allies", we could have caught him.
Once we catch him, bring him to the Hague to stand trial. I would have tried to instigate a wire tapping program under FISA supervision, like Clinton TRIED to do but the republicans blocked.
I would not have violated international law to conduct a war. North Korea now has more than enough ammo to argue a case for invading South Korea.
2006-09-25 12:43:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by darkemoregan 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
I would have not wasted this country's good fighting men and women and billions of dollars in Iraq which had nothing to do with 9-11 and was not a threat to America. I would have concentrated on finding Bin Laden and the rest of Al Qaeda and bringing them to justice, dead or alive.
Then I would work on peaceful solutions like improving the living conditions in third world nations that breed terrorists. Happy people dont become terrorists!
2006-09-25 12:32:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Thats the problem, all the left has is I hate Bush. No ideas besides surrendering to terrorists. Whats goo dis that the left is the ones that abort their kids in record numbers and soon, they will simply cease to exist.
Small wonder that limoliberals have had to scour the Latino and Black communities for voters.
2006-09-25 12:32:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
not start the war in Iraq, that has made more people hate us. Now we should just leave. They dont want us there and we arent helping anything.
2006-09-25 12:31:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by LVJoeD 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
No one can reasonably answer this question since there is far too much information about what's going on then we will ever know.
2006-09-25 12:32:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by blueyeznj 6
·
1⤊
2⤋