Do all members of a species have the same number of unique genes? I know that each gene is responsible for one or many traits in a species. Is it possible for one member to have a wholly unique gene that is not found in other members or does that imply that the member actually belongs to a different species.
Lets say member 1 in a species has the following UNIQUE genes: A,B,C,D
Is it possible for member 2 to have the following UNIQUE genes: A,B,C,D,E.
I have been told that all members of a species have the same total number of UNIQUE genes. For the case above, either 4 genes or 5 genes. I do not know if this is true.
When i say unique, i am not taling about alleles or damaged genes. I mean a gene that is totally not found in the chromosome of the other member. Would this imply that member 2 has a wholly new trait that is not found in member 1 and therefore, member 2 actually is of a different species from member 1?
Thanks
2006-09-25
05:15:29
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Allan G
1
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Biology
Thanks for the answers. For the case of Down syndrome, where do they get the extra gene from: I believe down syndrome has to do with a damaged gene and not a wholly new unique gene.
2006-09-25
05:22:13 ·
update #1
For one of the replies below, when you say lost a gene, I believe that you mean the gene is deactivated. On the otherhand, I am talking about a wholly new gene. I know about the Y chromosome but thats different since it deals with sex. For instance, we know that humans get a gene from each parent to make a pair. In my case, if one parent had the E gene, where would the offspring get the other one gene that makes a pair? Doesn't this imply that they are actually different species?
2006-09-25
05:27:53 ·
update #2