And did you notice that when Clinton put HIM on the hotseat regarding his lack of journalistic integrity, that the reporter could not (or would not) answer the question?
2006-09-25 05:06:57 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
I am, I read the 9-11 commission report which was stacked republican and the report supported Clinton's administration, he did alot to foil terrorist when he did NOT have support of congress
Bush has the support of senate, congress, supreme court, and at one time the world, and he has prosecuted far less al qaeda operatives than Clinton
2006-09-25 05:18:37 · answer #1 · answered by Sara 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Well, your question is a little biased but let me make two points:
1. The same people criticising Clinton for not doing enough to kill Bin Laden are, mostly, the same people who accused him of wagging the dog everytime he did do something. However, he had bi-partisan support for his military interventions except Kosovo.
2. Clinton never does something for no reason. He was showing Democrats how to argue the issue of terrorism since Democrats are having a hard time with a unified message.Maybe he was trying to help Hillary with her problems on the left. Maybe he just wanted to ressurect the whole "vast right wing conspiracy". Who knows. There was a purpose to it.
2006-09-25 14:49:13 · answer #2 · answered by JB 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There seems to be allot of edginess in politics lately. It was nice sorta to see him defend himself and save his integrity. Does the phrase "Cheap shot" apply here? In a way I think it makes Clinton stronger not weaker. It puts him in the spotlight as a major player and not a used up politician. I think it's a sign of the next presidential run in 08.
2006-09-25 19:44:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton rules. Those worthless commie Faux News people should all be shot.
Watch how Faux News edits the interview to make them look as good as possible.
Find out everything that makes Murdock money and boycott the worthless piece of crap.
2006-09-25 15:48:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm incredibly proud of Clinton. Fox got just what they deserved. It's ok to bash Clinton, but oh my! don't say anything against Shrub and Club.
2006-09-25 17:48:34 · answer #5 · answered by Teacher 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, every "fact" and assertion Clinton made has been shown to be wrong.
Richard Clarke was not demoted, source Clarke's book.
Republicans did not accuse Clinton of beign obsessed with Bin Laden, they supported every military action he took, except Kosovo,, source Lexis/Nexis
Michael Scheurer, CIA Bin Laden desk chief under Clinton and Bush said Clinton and Berger had 8-10 chances to kill Bin Laden and declined each time. Bush had 1 chance and took it and missed.
Clinton says FBI/CIA wouldn't let him use military, Pres. outranks anyone at those 2 agencies.
Everytime we get to see Clinton melt down and blame others for his incompetence we win. See you in Nov when we win again.
2006-09-25 14:37:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anthony M 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm so glad, I am so so glad!!! It is so refreshing to hear an intelligent person speak his mind honestly on a news show. That man is one of the coolest presidents ever, and I hope he keeps doing the work he is doing now. I love that guy.
2006-09-25 17:35:38 · answer #7 · answered by josephine 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately I didn't see it but I read about it online. I am very glad Clinton questioned his integrity!! It sounds like he handled the situation very well.
2006-09-25 12:10:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Man, I miss the guy. No one over at fox news is half as smart as Clinton.
2006-09-25 12:13:33 · answer #9 · answered by Olivier P 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Mike Wallace, after years of regret over not spanking his little brat Chris enough. Like Bush, you never would have heard of c.wallace if he hadn't had a famous father.
2006-09-25 14:39:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋