Girl, that's a tough one, but assuming I'd have no option to say "none", I'd have to go for the second one, as although she's uglier than the first one, at least she's famous and I could sell my story to the press, and the last one's a bloke, and even an ugly woman's pusssy is better than a bloke's hairy bumhole.
2006-09-25 04:47:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kango Man 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
None
I don't bang on women. It's dehumanizing.
And RUPAUL is not a woman!
(Hey, any guy who's a guy listens to the Stern show!)
2006-09-25 12:28:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I've had number one and she was a right little goer.... number two I think I may be related to by marriage... number three looks a little hard up and desperate and would probably be all clingy in the morning.... so it's number one again, I guess. Pass the blue pills please...
2006-09-25 11:48:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by lickintonight 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
RuPaul 4 sure. The others are just too masculine.
2006-09-25 12:16:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tyler H 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gorilla parker-bowles
2006-09-25 11:44:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by andylefty 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would bang RuPaul. She may have a wanker, but she's still sexier than the others.
2006-09-25 11:45:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Joey 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definitely the third one - I might learn something about myself. Can't knock it if I haven't tried it.
2006-09-25 11:43:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Silkie1 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh Gee - Another intelligent question!
2006-09-25 11:40:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Have to say, number three. If I HAD to mind. I'd rather not bang any of them.
2006-09-25 11:39:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by kahuna382000 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
your selection is just as rigged as religion
I pick none of the above
I choose free will not pick from litter
2006-09-25 11:41:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋