Who here thinks Clinton showed his TRUE colours on Fox News Sunday?

Question

He showed what an @$$ he truly is. He also showed he can't answer a direct question without name calling. He also showed how he divides the country by calling the Republicans and GW names. He truly was the WORSE president EVER.

By losing his temper, he showed how he knows, deep down inside, that he was more interested in cheating on the golf course than getting Bin Laden. And the Cole was attacked under HIS watch and he did NOTHING. Absolutely nothing. And things are just peachy in Somalia now, right? How many remember pictures of our soldiers being dragged through the streets. Yeah, anyone who thinks Clinton was a great guy, really needs to get out of the basement.

Answer 1

I dont' know if he "lost his temper" or was reading a prepared statement that required him to demonstrate typical democratic faux emotion. Most likely he was sent the questions in advance and had them prepared but thought the interview would be more aggressive then it was, similar to Mike Wallace's brand of interview which is like a crimianl prosecution.

But it does show his true colors because he lied and dealt with half truthes, which were hallmarks of his Presidential administration.

ADDED: why do Clinton supporters say he "won" or "handed Wallace his @ss"? The interview was not aggressive and Clinton's reaction was out of place considering how mild the questions were.

Answer 2

Clinton absolutely showed his true colors. Take a moment to get past the Monica thing, and take a look at what a strong leader looks like.
There is no question that he lost his temper, but clearly, all you saw was that. Had you actually listened, he did answer the question. And he did it with class, observe.

1. He clearly stated that despite the right wing attacks, he continues to he support Bush. (this is called class, he may not agree with the Presidents actions but has enough respect for his position to be supportive)

2. He cited numerous actions he that he took to fight the war on terror, including appointing a Republican Secretary of Defense Richard Clark, who by the way also worked under the Reagen administration. Clinton in FACT, developed the nation's first anti-terrorism policy, and appointed the first national coordinator of anti-terrorist efforts. (this is called answering the question)

3. Clinton actually admitted that he felt like he failed in the war against terror because he did not successfully capture Osama Bin Laden. (this is called accountability)

I get that with the current administration it is OK to get mad at reporters and then not coherently speak, or answer a question. It makes perfect sense to me that all of the focus is on the fact the Clinton got angry, and that it is being completely ignored that he then answered the questions, not only coherently but with class, facts, and accountability.

Answer 3

You must have watched a far different interview than I did. It looked to me like he was sick of being accused falsely of doing nothing, when he did what he could under the circumstances.
It sounded to me like he said the man who was in charge of counterterrorism, Richard Clarke, was demoted under Bush II and Bin Laden was put on the back burner until 9/11.
Just goes to show that no matter what is said and done, conservatives will never be happy with any answer they get if it doesn't conform to what they think the answer should be according to the spin they want to relay. Go back and watch the interview with unbiased eyes. He answers the questions, and I don't blame him for being sick of the ambush technique used by Fox. It is so typical of them.

Answer 4

No! Fox information in easy terms spent 2 days protecting Michael Jackson and then moved directly to the wellness care usurpation as a replace of spending the three months on Michael that all human beings else spent! Who cares concerning to the unconstitutional hacks in Washington?! we'd fairly pay attention Jamie Foxx telling us how Michael become "theirs" and "they" shared him with "us"!

Answer 5

He did lose his temper, and I was hoping that he would take the opportunity to really show how partisan FOX is, but that doesn't change the fact that He did a much better job than Bush did. Even the 9-11 commission report attests to that.

Answer 6

I would rather my leader lose his temper rather than a leader who forgets how to talk. Or chew a pretzel. Geesh

Answer 7

Said he overcame the heart problem NO mention of coming with Lewinsky!

Answer 8

His "true colors" ??? You must be one of these brainwashed-right winged religious zealots !!! Bush shows how much of a moron he is at EVERY press conference the bumbling idiot has and you want to talk about an ex-presidents true colors. Go figure.

You obviously drink the bush "kool-aid". I guess you chose to overlook the cruise missles launched after the Cole being attacked. Funny you should bring up bring up Somalia. You talk about our servicemen being pulled through the streets and yet you mention nothing of the U.S. contractors murdered and hanging from a bridge in Fallujah or of the complete fiasco bush has us in over in Iraq.

You my friend are a moron.

Answer 9

Oh please....You idiots have been attacking him and that farce of a movie last week was the final straw.....he simply defended himself and seriously handed Wallace his own A*S .

Be upset if you want...if my guy had been taken to town the way wallace was i'd be mad to....that interview was awesome.

Answer 10

AMEN

He is the master of the liberal sidestep. He can't answer one simple question regarding his ineptitude.

BTW We are still waiting for an ANSWER, Bill.