Why did Clinton keep talking about Fox News and the right wingers, rather than just welcome the opportunity to tell his side, and "set the record straight" from his point of view?
Bush gets called all kinds of nasty names by Democrats, yet he keeps his cool.
Was it an unfair question?
2006-09-25 04:20:51 · 7 answers · asked by American citizen and taxpayer 7 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
That shows you who the better man is .
As for Clinton , he is trying to build a legacy and he can't be bothered by truth . He is busy creating a false impression ( of the trail he left of perjury ; impeachment;disbarment; professional improprieties & scandals) -by his involvement in philanthropy and globalization .He wasn't interested in humanity or the American public when he was in office . He deliberately refused the offer of bin Laden from the Sudanese -for fear it would dampen his approval rating . He did not want bin laden-yet-he now dumps on his own F.B.I. & C.I.A. -as to why he didn't kill binLaden . For Clinton to say he was the only one who came close to killing bin Laden - and if he were now the Prez , he's have more than 20,000 troops out there -is a huge , huge lie . Clinton loathed the military . Chris Wallace said it wasn't a smirk-he was merely in "WONDERMENT ", AT WHAT HE WAS HEARING FROM CLINTON .
2006-09-25 09:02:26 · answer #1 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You need to you tube the clip and see for your self...the whole of the incident is 11 minutes...all Clinton does during that time is tell his side of the story, "set the record straight"...and some. And yes, Chris Wallace was in fact smirking in his seat, cowardly towards the back of his chair.
For you're information Bush has never been in a real debate with Democrats and is rarely in one on one forums with anyone with opposing stances...he is not an orator and appears apparently unable to hold a discussion holding even the minimal amount of fluency or intelligence...he keeps his cool because hes too stupid to speak up for himself....and thats the straight up truth.
2006-09-25 09:05:29 · answer #2 · answered by Aan 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Chris Wallace probably really was smirking - I mean, could YOU go face to face with Clinton & not have images of him & Monica Lewinsky runnin through your mind the whole time?! lmao He (Chris) was probably flashin on the "dress incident" or other equally as over-discussed imagery! Wasn't there something about a cigar, too? Not to mention all of the other scandals he (clinton) was involved in - so if he's spouting off about how much he did to kill Osama, how are we supposed to believe him?!
2006-09-25 04:30:41 · answer #3 · answered by pumpkin 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I've always thought Wallace had a kind of smirk on his face..! Obviously, it got the best of Clinton!
2006-09-25 04:51:33 · answer #4 · answered by luckistrike 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Clinton DOES mean a lot to society. Look at his humanitarian work. Look at who was on the front lines, raising money for Katrina victims, while our own president just flew over the site.
It was definitely an unfair question. They basically tried to trap him into falling for the "I didn't do enough to capture Bin Laden" trick, in order to absolve Bush and the Republicans of any responsibility. They distort the truth as much as they can to get people on their side, and Clinton's just supposed to sit there and let people slander him while he's in the middle of helping them? I don't think so.
Read the transcript. Next question.
2006-09-25 04:31:00 · answer #5 · answered by el_scorcho6 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Chris Wallace is always smirking. Bush loses his cool too. Heck we all do when confronted with something we supposedly failed at etc.
2006-09-25 06:41:32 · answer #6 · answered by HKWSTL 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes he was smirking but it was so funny to see clinton get all in a hissy. I mean does he really think he means something to society today! I hope not. It was a fair question he just couldn't take the heat.
2006-09-25 04:26:04 · answer #7 · answered by alasonlmc 1 · 2⤊ 3⤋