Are you proud that Clinton told off Fox News?

Question

It's about time someone did!

Wallace lied, and under false pretense, to get an interview, another Fox trick to get higher ratings.

Clinton answered the questions, and then told off Fox News!

At least clinton met with his anti-terrorism chief weekly. Bush did twice! And Clinton got a lot more terrorist than Bush ever has.

I'm very, very proud of former President Clinton.

Are you glad Clinton told off Fox News?

Answer 1

Yes I am without a doubt. It is about time some told Fox News a thing or two. As far as I am concerned they are just a republican mouthpiece rather than a source of news.

Answer 2

I am a Democrat and voted for Bill Clinton twice. I would not go back and change my votes. But if he were to run for election again I would have second thoughts. He seemed emotionally disturbed and unstable. This tirade means I will not consider voting for Hillary. I think she is is "no Bill Clinton" to start with but now knowing that she would have an unstable partner it would be devastating to our country to have her in the Whitehouse.

I am no great fan of Fox news but Chris Wallace is trully a "fair" interviewer and did not deserve the abuse that President Clinton laid on him. It was embarassing to see President Clinton act like a spoiled brat. He should have addressed the question. Wallace was incredibly polite.

It looks to me like President Clinton will go the Carter way. He will do great things in the charity realm but will never be considered stable when speaking in public on other issues.

Answer 3

And just how many terrorists were caught while Clinton was in office? Let's see there was that blind guy and what was it four associates? Who else?

Actually if they don't get Usama I'm going to say Bush isn't any better than Clinton. Oh wait there was that Al Zaqawi guy they got and a few others. OK if Bush doesn't get Usama he's almost as bad as Clinton at catching terrorists.

After Slick Willy said his famous quote," I never had sex with that woman" I haven't cared what he said.

IF Hillary gets to be President I can only imagine what Bill will do with the female staff.*LOL* After all he won't be distracted by 'real' business like he was as President.

Answer 4

Clinton runs away from responsibility yet again.

Sure, blame the interviewer. That's the ticket. Typical liberal deflection from the truth.

The fact is that Bush has been subject to hit pieces like this for 6 years now, but has the integrity and graciousness to accept this as part and parcel of politics. But not the 'great' sink-spewing impeached Bubba.

Nice stain you got there on your blue dress...

Answer 5

Yes, but it hardly seems to make a difference. Considering how he also seems to be snuggling up to the Bush's lately (for WHO'S benefit?), I'm not so sure of his allegiances or true intentions. A lot of legislation he passed paved the way for Bush's administration to do what it's now doing. Look at NAFTA, for instance.

The neo-con citizens seem to make up their own "truths", and swear by them. They'll listen to the Rush/O'Reilly propaganda as if getting the word from Christ himself, and disregard everything else as lies. They're good little Nazis. It's unforunate that they don't even really get what the REAL agenda of their own masters is, though it's only thinly masked.

It's also unfortunate that the left has been so duped into wallowing in the "issues", that they don't see it either. They have failed miserably in launching a pre-emtive strategy, or bringing the NWO power and money shifts currently underway into the light for the world to see. Chavez might be a military dictator, but he was absolutely RIGHT. What Bush (the neo-cons), corporate interests, and the (multi-national) Trilateral Commission are in the midst of implementing is a GLOBAL threat to every nation, especially those not in their cabal. Our prideful determination to believe that just because AMERICA did it, it must be okay is just plain unconsciounable, if not evil denial of reality.

If you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the problem. Right now, the political left is as blind as the right, and is therefore part of the problem.

The NAFTA superhighway is already coming, Mexican truckers will be all over our roads next year, China owns both ends of the Panama Canal, our own ports are being sold to foreign interests, jobs and companies are going overseas, our Federal Reserve (which creates and controls our money, it's availablity, and it's worth) is PRIVATELY owned by a majority of FOREIGN banks, we're being KEPT in dependence on oil for fuel, Monsanto and Dupont (with our government's assistance) has developed genetically altered seeds which produce plants with no viable seeds (so world farmers/nations will have to RE-buy seeds each year, from whoever controlled them. SEARCH: "terminator seeds"), people ignore the Trilateral Commission (do a search)and it's impact (if not direction) of world events, countries are consolidating into trade unions (we're next, the North American Trade union), our media is already owned/controlled by MEGA-corporations with a political/profit agenda, the Patriot Act diminished our citizen's rights (freedoms, liberties, civil rights, guarantee of due process, and our protections from unfair treatment by our own government) while increasing Presidential powers and immunity from public scrutiny (basically protecting government from US, and protecting us from NOTHING...where does terrorism even fit in??? and what have they planned that they needed to do this in advance??? The battle over prisoner torture directly affects YOU, as the Patriot Act re-defined a "national threat" VERY vaguely...so watch what you say.), and Newt Gingrich has already made it clear that we are IN WWWIII and that Bush should just come out and admit it. This is just a sampling, though. You really need to keep track of WORLD news, including financial, scientific, and agricultural.

It's a political GAME for control of the world's wealth and power. The right and left are so busy looking for fouls that they've lost sight of the BALL. Now THAT is why Bush made such an effort to DIVIDE us. The neo-cons want us ALL pre-occupied.

KEEP YOUR EYES ON THE BALL.

Answer 6

Fox did no longer supply a pretend pretense. Wallace arranged 5 questions related to Clinton's worldwide Initiative and 5 different questions and enable Clinton be attentive to that he envisioned to talk concerning to the international Initiative for decrease than 0.5 of the interview. i think of Clinton become out of line for blowing up like that, that query quite wasn't that out of line and become unquestionably what i might anticipate any in charge journalist to ask. this complete element jogged my memory of while he wagged his finger and pronounced "i did no longer have sexual family members with that woman". I gave him the whole thing concerning to the doubt then, i do no longer think of i'm going to this time. the guy is a liar, and how he blew up coupled with the mannerisms that strike a cord in me of previous situations while he lied purely make me think of he has something to cover. Why is it that Sandy Berger stole information from the national documents (stuffing them in his pants and socks in accordance to eye witness money owed) and then destroyed them in the previous the 9/11 cost could've gotten to them? there is something incorrect with this image.

Answer 7

I am proud that Wallace was the ONLY one, among all of Clinton's interviewers, to ask him a fair question. We're still waiting for an answer.

Clinton was his typical egocentric, defensive, immature, finger pointing self. It's too bad, he just never seems to grow up and take responsibility.

Answer 8

I find it hilarious that when Bush is ATTACKED by the media DAILY he can manage to act like an adult.

When Clinton is asked ONE simple question regarding his ineptitude he goes of like a 12 year old that had their bicycle taken away. Real intelligent and classy.

Isn't it ironic, don't ya think?

Answer 9

I am glad that anybody will tell off faux news. But it was especially rewarding that Bill Clinton did it. I am also proud of the people that answer and stick up for him here. After all he was probably the best president in history for running the government in an efficient way.

Answer 10

asking if bill did enough is a loaded question and i think bubba was prepared for it. did you notice though that he did not answer the question only passed the buck. i do not blame bill for 9/11 like some and unless there is some "vast left wing conspiracy" to cover up his administrations lack of focus on terrorism.