2006-09-25 01:24:32 · 6 answers · asked by jerk 1 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
definitely to save lives
coz you dont have the right to kill when you havent created it
2006-09-25 01:28:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ooh... tough issue.
Although many people say the latter, if killing someone else could save your own or one you love, what would you do?
It's not that different from the black market organ dilemma.
I must agree though. I really hope a better way can be achieved to save lives without sacrificing others.
2006-09-25 09:09:24 · answer #2 · answered by Studier Alpha 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ACCORDING TO ME"LIFE IS PRECIOUS"!IT IS TACTFULL AND BETTER TO SAVE SOMEONES LIFE RATHER THAN PUSHING HIM IN THE VALLEY OF DANGER!IF IT IS FOR THE SAKE OF GRUDGE THEN TO ONE SHOULD GO TO THE EXTENT OF KILLING!ATLEAST SAVING THE LIVES WILL GIVE THE INNER CONTENT AND SATISFACTION!WHICH WOULD NOT COME AT YOUR DOOR WHEN SOMEONE IS KILLED!
CONFUSED QUESTIONER IT WOULD BE BETTER IF YOU THINK ON THIS MATTER!
BUDDING SCIENTIST:
BENI_BEAR5218
2006-09-25 09:04:33 · answer #3 · answered by MOHITA 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll vote for save
2006-09-25 08:30:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
to save life. life is something that human should be appreciate
2006-09-25 08:46:08 · answer #5 · answered by arveen paria arasuk 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Duh,,what do you think genius?????
2006-09-25 08:49:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋