i just saw a man hit himself in the face with a spring operated umbrella and a woman in my office hit her head on a filing cabinet... which was funnier? you decide!
2006-09-25 00:32:57 · 12 answers · asked by arrrthelifeofapirate 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Other - Entertainment
are you guys insane, its hilarious!
2006-09-25 00:42:26 · update #1
by the way, last week i came off my motorbike and smashed up my knee a bit. the first thing i done when i got up was laugh at all the people who were shocked asking me if i need an ambulance!
2006-09-25 01:23:01 · update #2
Dead clowns are funny. Dead clowns make me do a laugh in my mouth. 'Cause they're dead.
Y'know, these other answers wouldn't bother me half as much if the people writing them new beans about grammar. What's that one above me? "But to accidentally hurting yourself in public" What the hell does that mean?
2006-09-25 01:41:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, it shouldn't be funny. Rewording. What's funnier. Being hit in the face with a spring operated umbrella or hitting your head on a filing cabinet. Neither. It's not funny.
2006-09-25 00:41:13 · answer #2 · answered by ArmedGangstaz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you do no longer think of violence against every person is okay or humorous? I do. I giggle at violence each and all of the time. So do maximum individuals. the variation is, I giggle at FICTIONAL violence written into high quality comedy. that is not a perplexing distinction to make: even little infants can tell the variation between Wile E. Coyote getting an anvil dropped on his head, and their buddy bleeding and crying after falling off the jungle gymnasium. i think of the area that no violence is humorous is ridiculous, and finally ends up in a puritanical society the place all human beings is afraid to giggle at humorous issues for concern of what others will think of. As for the lads/women individuals element, take a seem at modern sitcoms like 30 Rock or New woman or Parks and sport; observe that those (generally written and directed by ability of girls individuals) shows unquestionably DO start up making use of girls individuals in humor products as something extra superior than the promptly-side who's aggravated by ability of each and all of the humorous men, and as even the butts of slapstick. i think of that's the final direction: we are actually not shifting in direction of "violence is in no way humorous; guffawing at violence is blasphemy," yet as a replace in direction of "fictional slapstick could be sturdy comedy and we are all able to distinguishing certainty from fiction; and all of us may be the butts of jokes."
2016-10-17 22:37:05 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's funny about someone else's pain? Put yourself in their place, how would you feel when people start laughing at you? It not only hurts, but to accidentally hurting yourself in public is embarrassing, shame on you for laughing at the expense of someone else.
2006-09-25 01:06:44 · answer #4 · answered by Laurie K 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the man
2006-09-25 00:42:02 · answer #5 · answered by company 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We laugh at men when they do slapstick, but not trhat much at women, but women will laugh at women doing it , go figure!
2006-09-25 00:47:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither :) if you find things like this to be funny you must have a lame life
2006-09-25 00:40:41 · answer #7 · answered by military and veteran advocate 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a woman
2006-09-25 00:39:09 · answer #8 · answered by Passionate 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the man...it's always fun to watch a man get hurt...haha
2006-09-25 01:03:38 · answer #9 · answered by Evil Wordmonger, LTD LOL 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why funny? they are suffering..we shouldn't just stand aside lauging them
2006-09-25 00:49:39 · answer #10 · answered by Chanel 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋