That is exactly what Slick Willy and Hillary Clinton do professionally and politically ... they make any lie appear to be true up until last night on Fox News !
That Silver tongued Devil, finger wagging, womanizing scoundrel, Slick Willy Clinton is only surpassed by Jimmy Carter who daily struggles with his "Dementia" and the DNC Court Jester Dr. Howard "The Buffoon" Dean! Can you believe he is a physician??!!
"I did not have sex with that woman" Clinton did it again in front of the whole world last night on FOX News and got caught in the act of being himself . . . a 24 karat phony!
Anyone with two (2) fingers of sloping forehead after last nights interview can see the abject lack of character this man possesses!
He is worried abouty his "legacy". But what he STILL does ot realize and can not change even if he did, is that his legacy is one shame!
Inserting cigars in the Vaginal opening of a young intern in the Oval Office "is" his legacy now, matter what he says.
2006-09-25 00:04:30 · 11 answers · asked by B'klyn Barracuda 3 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Well, I for one, thought he was brainless before, but this just took the cake. "I can't answer for myself, so I will turn the tables and point to everyone else and then at the end say I never pointed to anyone else" HYPOCRITE! Has been from day one!
2006-09-25 00:13:50 · answer #1 · answered by Carrie 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'd take a legacy of vaginal cigar insertion over the current administration's legacy ANY day! It's egregious we actually now HAVE a less-than-two-finger slant to the forehead moron currently in the Oval Office. Clinton reduced the deficit and turned it into a surplus and our current president has run it back up to an incredible high. Tired of it yet? I sure am. Heck, that doesn't even factor in the attempts to take our rights, the incredible expansion of executive powers , the wiretapping, torturing, secrets, lies, outright manipulation of the truth, the color-coded 'this is how scared you need to be' meter, the constant fear the guy keeps purposefully spreading, geez it never ends. I can't wait to see how history judges him for starting more terrorist cells instead of squashing them, trying to censor the news, write discrimination into our constitution. The moral party? I think not. I highly, highly doubt Jesus would opt for corporate breaks, trickle-down economics, legal discrimination and all the other things we've cringed and seen these past few years. Anyone else tired of it? Clinton was a great president, and is a great statesman, and yes, he screwed up. Bush tends to do that daily by at least 10am, 11am at the latest. Clinton wasn't perfect, but I much prefer him to the caricature of a man we have now.
2006-09-26 16:16:57 · answer #2 · answered by Mark L 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well in response to some of the other responses:
I found it embarassing for the Lewinsky scandal to come out. It must've been terrible for him. BUT, he did lie under oath. That is perjury. That is an impeachable offense. What kind of lawyer goes under oath and lies about something that isn't even illegal in the first place? I'm sick of people pretending that Clinton was impeached for a b---job.
I'm not saying Bush is perfect, but he's a hell of a lot better than Clinton. It's just a shame the press and academia has been out to get him since before he took office. Hell... right now we got people accusing Bush of being a part of some conspiracy to lower gas prices with no evidence at all. When Clinton was in office, he released oil from the strategic reserves just to temporarily lower prices and give himself a boost in the polls.
What has Clinton done that was any good for the country? The guy was a do little, slick talking, scumbag opportunist in office. He's a slimeball now. History will not be kind to this man.
2006-09-26 03:11:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I truly beleive this was all a stunt. A ploy to draw more attention to the Clinton family.
Clinton is tired of hearing how he has no balls, so he goes on tv, way after the fact, and trys to change the mind of the Americans.
He did say (truth, or not) that he came closer to killing Bin Ladin than anybody has ever come. Well, he didn't kill him, did he?? It wasn't a good idea to admit that. Why didn't he if he was close enough?? makes me think.
Clinton and his family have always been the white trash of the White House. He is simply trying to regain some control even if it is from his wife's success. Why else would they be together after all the scandal and public embarressment? For profit and personal gain.
2006-09-25 00:16:12 · answer #4 · answered by Fitchurg Girl 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I am a Democrat and voted for Bill Clinton twice. I would not go back and change my votes. But if he were to run for election again I would have second thoughts. He seemed emotionally disturbed and unstable. This tirade means I will not consider voting for Hillary. I think she is is "no Bill Clinton" to start with but now knowing that she would have an unstable partner it would be devastating to our country to have her in the Whitehouse.
I am no great fan of Fox news but Chris Wallace is trully a "fair" interviewer and did not deserve the abuse that President Clinton laid on him.
It looks to me like President Clinton will go the Carter way. He will do great things in the charity realm but will never be considered stable when speaking in public on other issues.
2006-09-26 02:36:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i'm a Democrat and voted for bill Clinton two times. i does no longer bypass back and alter my votes. yet while he have been to run for election back i might have 2nd suggestions. He appeared emotionally disturbed and volatile. This tirade ability i won't be able to evaluate vote casting for Hillary. i think of she is is "no bill Clinton" at first yet now understanding that she might have an volatile better half it would be devastating to our u . s . to have her interior the Whitehouse. i'm no super fan of Fox information yet Chris Wallace is trully a "truthful" interviewer and did no longer deserve the abuse that President Clinton laid on him. It seems to me like President Clinton will bypass the Carter way. he will do good issues interior the charity realm yet isn't in all probability seen good while conversing in public on different themes.
2016-10-17 22:36:24 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton's behaviour was disturbing, really, when I think about his "Slick Willie" persona during his Presidency. It just goes to show what happens to individuals who grow accustomed to lying and getting away with it, when they are finally confronted with the truth. I wondered for years why Clinton never got Bin Laden when he had every opportunity for eight years to do so. To find out that he came "close" to killing him, and then tried to slip and slide out of it--then burst into an angry temper tantrum under pressure--simply confirmed the negative image I've gained of him in the past ten years.
2006-09-26 04:44:28 · answer #7 · answered by nacmanpriscasellers 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bill Clinton is the ultimate politician. Charismatic? Yes! What he did in his personal life is none of my business. But he did lose it with Chris Wallace last night because the truth that he had a chance to take out Osama Bin Laden and didn't is something he didn't want people to know. He is denying it because that's how he deals with unpleasant truths about himself.
2006-09-25 00:16:28 · answer #8 · answered by missingora 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You haven't made one meaningful point throughout all of that ranting...Yes, he had sex with that intern. No, you were obviously not paying attention to the whole of the interview, evident from the fact that you haven't refered to it once.
You need to learn some more about Essay writing and actually staying on topic as well as maybe some spelling and sentence structure...maybe learning how to support your opinions with quotes and examples as well...matter fact, just go back to school please.
2006-09-25 08:31:13 · answer #9 · answered by Aan 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Who cares if he had CONSENTUAL intimate relations with someone? It was either a coverup to draw people away from the whitewater scandal or his employees' attempt to humiliate him and/or Lewinsky. I'd rather have some kinky bastard in office than someone bent on going to war with half the planet, or someone who's on serious psychotropic DRUGS.
by 2008 I think you'll WISH it was Clinton in office.
2006-09-25 00:17:16 · answer #10 · answered by Roadpizza 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋