English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

you dont know what you are supposed to know".

He gives Google and Yahoo search engines as examples. If you dont know you can find it. Thats all you need to know. You need not mug and pass examinations and have degrees in philosophy and theology, you need not be educated in the Vedas or byheart the Quran. Everything is a REPRESENTATION of Divinity, and it is the TRUTH. By eliminating the representations you will find the truth. Imagine there is nothing in the Earth God has created one man and one woman and trees and plants and snakes and sea. What must they do? God does not say anything but creates hunger for both of them. So they have to find a way to solve it. The clue is the fruit, when they open it they find bilateral symmetry, two untruths when "eliminated" by eating, gives the energy, which is the truth. The eliminated untruths NO LONGER EXIST for they are assimilated to give energy which is truth. The energy is the air, OMKARA. Compare this with modern economics shopping?

2006-09-24 21:42:07 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

If we "have to know" how do you explain the "ETTU CHURAKKAIS" people who have studied books and colleges and degrrees and universities who live in a perception level of absolute untruth, being paid more than people who know it all and are beggars? For life to be comfortable you need money otherwise you will die you wont exist. So the British concept of economic success through "study" is wrong. Whatever you need to "study" can be derived whenever you need to, from nature and human body. So it is material wealth that people need first even in order to have the motivation to "study" nature.

2006-09-24 23:53:38 · update #1

"And if you do not even know what you need to know -- how can you find out? You cannot google something if you don't even know what to google! "
You cannot trust Google either because Google is man-made. As such it will be full of programmers' bias. Search for "Hinduism" and search for "Islam" and you will see the difference = search for "Allah" and search for "Lakshmi"... Thats why anything that has not originated from natural (God-made) cannot be trusted because it does not derive its origin from God. Quran, Bible and Geeta are false because they are written by humans. It must be derivable from something that God made. The "PRAGNAI" of God exists comes from Nature. not from Tall buildings that look like Sivalingam. You can create hundred tall buildings but you are only spoiling the environment and blocking air circulation and hindering the birds pathways.

2006-09-25 03:33:47 · update #2

9 answers

is this supposed to be a question or the answer in itself....howver with the narration one thing i do agree with and that is the truth is always out there but shows itself only to those dare find it and are honest to adopt it.

2006-09-24 21:47:04 · answer #1 · answered by uknownotlove 3 · 0 0

No comparison. It is just a matter of awareness. When you shop, you may see one you want to buy but you have no immediate purpose envisioned for it. On the other hand, you know what you need immediately and that you will get if you can afford it. All others that you like but of no use and couldn't afford, you might think of "lifting."

Human compulsion requires no precognition. All philosophical discourses can last a lifetime and even a single grain of sand can be the subject of a quarrel by a community of philosophers and scholars but it does not signify anything save for the sheer significance (or insignificance) of that grain of sand.

2006-09-25 04:56:26 · answer #2 · answered by Bummerang 5 · 0 0

Your friend is very right. But he seems to struggle to convince "logically" or with the help of 'reasoning'.... and the attempt , however good , has certain inherent limitations. Mind knows only to analyse by referring to memory, a big data base.
Suppose the perception level deepens, say even beyond sense organs (like all those saintly/mystic/spiritual people)... then like your friend said, just looking deeply is enough, and what we need to know unravels by itself.

2006-09-25 05:15:30 · answer #3 · answered by Spiritualseeker 7 · 0 0

Your friend is right when it comes to getting things done through others. When you yourself have to do a work, you should possess adequate knowledge and skill, tol successfully complete. You cannot say your employer to go and find it from "Google". result won't be good.
VR

2006-09-25 04:51:14 · answer #4 · answered by sarayu 7 · 0 0

Your friend needs to take the history of science. Sure it is helpful to know "where to find". But your friend does not even know what he does not know!
And if you do not even know what you need to know -- how can you find out? You cannot google something if you don't even know what to google!

2006-09-25 10:24:08 · answer #5 · answered by hq3 6 · 0 0

now i have no clue as to what your on about it think the length of your question has put me off answering it its to early to read and it looks so complicated sorry

2006-09-25 04:50:14 · answer #6 · answered by ♥ ♥abc 4 · 0 0

Interesting! but in certain cases, you need to have an answer not to "look for an answer".

2006-09-25 05:17:32 · answer #7 · answered by just_friends 1 · 0 0

don't listen to ur friend anymore....lol... just kidding.......
we have to "know" for better looking and finding......i think....

2006-09-25 06:14:21 · answer #8 · answered by ink 2 · 0 0

that's what also einstein said. true indeed.

2006-09-25 04:47:39 · answer #9 · answered by jedi_rei 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers