where one consumes the flesh of a dead body?
2006-09-24 20:42:44 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Food & Drink ➔ Other - Food & Drink
Need you really say this???? You should know the answer to that...and none of us should waste our time telling you this.
2006-09-24 20:52:38 · answer #1 · answered by d4wn4j3sus 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't feel either are disorders, but I feel being a vegan is the healthiest course of action and that the meat (except vegetarian sources of protein like legumes, seeds, etc) and dairy groups are not necessarily to health, in fact may make you unhealthier.
I feel the dairy group is generally more detrimental than the meat group, and that if one does eat meat, it should be more as an ingredient, in small proportions, not eaten daily or at each meal, and free ranged and naturally processed (no pesticides, hormones, etc).
I feel fish (deep sea actually has health benefits (studies show) and should be used more often by the carnivore.
I personally am not a vegan or vegetarian, but about 95% vegetarian and 80% vegan, but wish I could do what I believe is best from the knowledge gained in my 28 years of studies of nutrition
2006-09-24 20:50:25 · answer #2 · answered by healthnut 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
neither a disorder is something harmful to the body such as buliemia or anorexia or gluttony. veganism and eating flesh are both vaible ways of eating.however humans are carnivorous by design, we have incisors for tearing meat. vegans MUST take vitamins and supplements because they're not receiving the nutrients the body needs. so you must choose the lifestyle that suits your body.
2006-09-25 01:26:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both are eating disorders, in my opinion.
I love the flesh of dead bodies--especially the tenderloin flesh of dead cows, grilled medium-rare (more on the rare side) so that the juice/blood oozes out on the plate and soaks into my baked potato. Now THAT is living!
2006-09-25 04:51:41 · answer #4 · answered by brevejunkie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that being vegan or being omnivorous are eating disorders. We have many choices in what to eat and what to not eat. It is our own responsibility to find what foods/diet nourish our own body. I don't think it's anybody's business, unless there is overeating to puking or taking lots of laxatives or starving oneself. There are extremes of eating when an individual needs help & they deserve help when they are so unbalanced.
When I was growing up I knew a few dancers who would binge and purge or just ate a weird calorie deprived diet.
2006-09-24 20:58:11 · answer #5 · answered by Susan M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
none of them are 'eating disorders' per se, an eating disorder is like bulimia etc. - if you meant to degrade meat eaters then your using this term is fine I guess but not fair. In my opinion a healthy, balanced diet is one where people eat a little bit of everything - fats, carbs, protien, vitamins, minerals ... all of it. Being vegan is just as good as being a total meat eater, both satisfy your body and palate so whats the problem. To each his own, as long as you enjoy what you eat and its good for your body.
2006-09-24 20:51:35 · answer #6 · answered by noogney 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither of the above is an eating disorder.
2006-09-24 20:52:08 · answer #7 · answered by survivor 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion eating dirorder is if you stop eating real food altogether. I mean seriously, why the hell would anyone stop eating meat just cause it'd make them fat? That's crazy, food is too good to give up!
2006-09-24 20:53:56 · answer #8 · answered by Tyson G 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Huh? Neither of those is an eating disorder. It is ridiculous to suggest that.
2006-09-24 20:49:35 · answer #9 · answered by Amelia 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mental disorder.. it's the point
2006-09-24 20:45:51 · answer #10 · answered by menina 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋