Clinton did more for this country domestically than Bush ever dreamed of. Bush is so irresponsible that he took a nice surplus that Clinton gave us and turned it into a raging deficit. Bush is not cut out for being President. He has little understanding of how the system really works. He is only in office because his brother in Florida rigged voting machines so he would win the electoral college. Just think about htis, he has only vetoed one bill since being in office. That scares me. I call him Little Georgie because of his inane attitude when he gives speeches or orates in public. It pains me to watch the man try to sound intelligent.
2006-09-24 18:53:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by dougp3102000 2
·
5⤊
2⤋
Clinton has a thin skin and his outside intrests directly caused 9/11 because his eye was on a skirt and not on the ball, Bush ain't perfect but his attention is not diverted like your boy. 10 times at bat and your wunderkind could not pull the trigger. Clinton also knew of the Fatwa and decided to chase an intern with a Cigar, Clinton is not a Statesmen. Statesmen make difficult decisions. Clinton followed public opinion while Statesmen like the current president and Winston Churchill did not.
2006-09-25 02:34:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I find it interesting that you believe foreign countries had any respect for the U.S. in the first place. Isolationism and distance are not going to save you from the Islamic nuts of the world. Not a good strategy. Also, the political climate is as it always has been; divided.
War is hell and people are going to die, whether you run (and scream to the world that you have no resolve whatsoever), or not. Talk about emboldening the enemy, that will certainly do it, just as Spain caved into pressure so easily. (another obvious victory for the terrorists).
Speaking of Clinton: He looked like a real statesman during his discussion with Chris Wallace today. His ego got the best of him again. A great speaker without a spine is not what I want as a President. He would be great at selling used cars, especially to women. Give me a leader, not a follower of polls who does not know how to be decisive and act independently. He is trying to protect a very fragile legacy built on a very unsteady foundation.
Your uninformed comments make me believe you are a sheltered college student or recently graduated. If an older adult, you really have no excuse.
2006-09-25 02:04:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
5⤋
I agree, why leave our troops in harms way after all the "mission has been accomplished" for two + years. In my opinion Bush is not man enough to carry even one of Clinton's cigars. I will be so glad when he is just a bad part of history when his term runs out. If we survive as a nation.
2006-09-25 08:26:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
People just don't think. They base there feelings and answers on illogical hearsay. They never use their common sense or put any effort on due diligence to uncover the underlying commitment to the hidden agendas for profit. People play participants in the stands to be unattached to the core responsibility for self expression. My opinion is Clinton was a courageous and effective leader who understood what was best for the US and took action. His agenda was to make America better than it was, always constantly improving conditions for all Americans. To invalidate or discredit his work is an insult to ones self. What is GW Bush's agenda.Well just by his actions he has done everything possible that up to this point has not worked. His actions dictate his commitment and hidden agenda. People don't have the foresight to see the price we will pay later for allowing poor leadership to exist. Impeach Bush!
2006-09-25 02:00:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by mikey 4
·
5⤊
1⤋
From the outside Bush .....say no more Clinton his a lover not a fighter , I suppose when its not your kid sent to fight a war then its cool , if Sadam was the problem where are all these top millatry units who could have taken him down .... Bush and Bin Laden were house friends .... they were were the first to recieve safe passage to a secret destination after 9 /11 ask the secret service , fbi , cia
2006-09-25 02:00:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by potlode 1
·
3⤊
1⤋
Surely you jest... clinton a statesman? not hardly... a statesman is a supporter of sovereignty for nations.... clinton was far from that.... bush isn't much closer....
Respect from other nations will not come by inaction and appologizing for making them attack the USA.... it will come from carrying a big stick....
We are not dealing with rational people in the Muslim world... a big stick is just about all they have the ability to understand... and they understand it better when it is laid across their head with some measure of force.... as many times as it takes....
I am all for letting the Muslims kill each other, it is their right.... I also think we should help them accomplish their murderous mission with a few bombs from about 50,000 ft.
2006-09-25 01:51:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Hah! If I was enrolled in a professional military I'd rather be supported back at home with regular leaves and comfy beds, though the comfy bed part might be exaggaration.
2006-09-25 02:00:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by dane 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
Why does it matter? Looks aren't everything. Don't judge a book by its cover.
2006-09-25 02:07:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Clinton just looks like an old... liar. Mind you - thesoldiers don't need to be "saved" - there is no draft here... these are brave men and women that chose to defend their country and we are over there for a reason - they don't need anyone to "save" them - what they do need is some support and belief and strength behind them and their (and I emphasize the word "their") choice to do - their choice.
He did not create political instability - if you knew more about this - you would know that this instability and these threats existed long before Bush and everyone - like Clinton - chose to ignore them. And - everyone is blaming poor Bush - he had the guts to do something to stand up for American and all of these liberals are tearing this countries' heart out - really.
All anyone watches is the liberal news stations and reads the stories - based on fiction - from the liberl media. I beg you and any other liberal - though you say you are independent -to watch the FOX News Channel - like Bill O'Reilly and Hannity and Colmes where the news is based on FACT not FICTION - like all of these lies splattered all over every other paper around. These people are all mad - political instability - to be concerned about terrorism and threats of nuclear weapons and war from who?? Do you ever pay attention to the source? Ever - do you ever question any of these lies that you are told ? Ever?
Let them kill each other - they will come back here - and they will kill us. Does everyone forget - is it so easy to forget - did you all jump on the Michael Moore John Kerry do nothing ignore everything boat - the one boat liberals should get on is the one out of the USA since all they do is complain and get brainwashed by the media - it is so frightening to think so many believe in the things like you said - so many chose not to question this NONSENSE and learn the TRUTH!
The one thing you did say that I do agree with in your question was that Bush IS right on a lot of issues - he is fighting for thie country - just like the men and women over there fighting for us. We are fighting for a freedom that those people desire.. crave while all of these liberals just sit in the USA and whine and abuse the FREEDOMS that we are all so lucky to have.
The evil of man is to watch things be destroyed and do nothing - take no action - that is also the ignorance of man and it breeds and breeds and it is a contagious brain washing disease - that is frightening. Imagine is we just ignored it to please everyone else - just ignored the rest of the world and the problems - that is not who we are in the USA - that is NOT what we are about. Did you ever wonder why these other leaders are so angry - what do they have to hide? Why are they so threatened? We are fighting for freedom - freedom and considering we are Americans - how can any of us be against that? If we are - if you are - go live in these countries then - don't just sit idly by and take in all in... all the lies - eductate yourself - learn the other POV - not just what people are saying and the front page of the liberal newspapers and newstations. Media is liberal - they love to abuse the "freedom of speech" - it does not mean that ANY of it is accurate - it is based on fiction - lies.. do these people believe in unicorns too. I have had it with ignorant Americans spreading these contaminated thoughts and ideas to others who just don't know any better.... Hilary Clinton, Bill Clinton - are you kidding me? Do you want to see a nation DESTROYED?
How can any American oppose their government since we as a democracy - the majority - elected it?Though we all may not agree on politics how can anyone believe that any leader of the free world would do anything to deliberately threaten his people. He is doing what is best for this nation - and has been the whole time - that is why he was re-elected - the majority spoke so I wish the minority would stop believing the lies and learn the truth. - not just settle for some storybook fiction that distorts it.
2006-09-25 01:44:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
9⤋