2006-09-24 18:32:25 · 14 answers · asked by curious_inquisitor 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
jae - How about by looking at the complexities around you and using some common sense.
2006-09-24 18:45:43 · update #1
girlwonder - Oh I see, order from chaos. Not just order though, intricate complex things. Not to mention life. Thats reasonable?
2006-09-24 18:54:33 · update #2
I do believe.
A ZINGER of a web site....a long long lecture about same!
http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/audio/newevidence.htm
2006-09-24 18:34:36 · answer #1 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Creation is not the most reasonable explanation. To say a being in the sky snapped his fingers and the universe suddenly appeared is an absurd idea and there's no evidence for it whatsoever. It's the solution for ignorant uncreative people who don't know how to think and are happy to live in a soap bubble. Just because something can't be explained doesn't mean you have to jump to conclusions with this god business (they did that with volcanoes and thunderstorms, etc., will such learn from previous error? not likely.) The answer will be found in quantum physics and it will eliminate the need for a creator god.
PS. "complexity" doesn't demand creation. A space shuttle may look complex to a human but a celestial being (ie "angel") could perceive it as random noise. Everything is relative.
2006-09-25 01:48:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe the complexities point in the exact opposite direction. It seems to me that an omniscient being would do away with the complexities, and the resulting errors that sometimes arise. It makes absolutely zero sense to me that an all powerful creator would allow so many fuc*ed up models to roll off the assembly line.
2006-09-25 01:39:29 · answer #3 · answered by dzbuilder 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's called a circular argument. First you have to PROVE that creationism is the most reasonable option--and since you can't do that, the rest of your supposed "question" is total nonsense.
2006-09-25 01:38:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is little proof of creation or evolution and there are no eyewitnesses. so what your asking all has to do with can you believe what you cant see or have faith and this is a question for mankind to ponder till the end of time because there will never be total proof one way or the other
2006-09-25 01:39:20 · answer #5 · answered by wiz of ia 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
How can creationism be most reasonable? Creationism is NOT reasonable because there is no proof at all that there is such thing as a God. And don't give me that junk about the bible as proof because anyone could have written the bible.
2006-09-25 01:34:59 · answer #6 · answered by Jae 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Regardless of your beliefs, your point of view is very narrow. I do not believe you understand any of the answers you get that challenge your assumptions. Before asking more questions, you may want to truly consider the answers you have already received. That is, if you are truly interested in understanding the concepts you present.
2006-09-25 01:36:06 · answer #7 · answered by Phoenix, Wise Guru 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Define reasonable. If by reasonable you mean 'the easiest solution to find', then I guess this fits your assertion. If that's not what you mean by reasonable, there's plenty of room to find other reasonable answers. That's how one can feel comfortable not believing.
2006-09-25 01:36:17 · answer #8 · answered by Phil 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Creationism is the most unreasonable there is. It begs the question "What created the creator? and his creator?" and if nothing created him, why can't the universe be without a creator?
2006-09-25 01:36:42 · answer #9 · answered by Alucard 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
lmao creationism is most reasonable FOR YOU. Stop pushing it on other ppl or ill report u for harrasment.
2006-09-25 01:34:46 · answer #10 · answered by ~*Renaissance*~ 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I do sort of believe in this....BUT not in a christian way.
So therefore, I am going to hell.
2006-09-25 02:02:30 · answer #11 · answered by AveGirl 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋