science and religion.?

Question

God created the universe but the laws of physics predicts that at the beginning of the universe there was nothing rational. Nothing outside and since there was noting outside where was god? Inside? But if you answer is "inside" explain why?

Because as far as I know the laws of physics make no sense at all inside when the universe exploited at that point. Or in other words God could not have been inside either.

Where was God? Where scientist call it singularity?

Answer 1

People who do not see harmony between religion and science, govt., history, etc. have a distorted perception of religion and other issues. Some of the most brilliant scientists in the history of the world believed in God: Newton, Pascal, Pasteur, Galileo, Faraday, Kepler, and so on. It is the scientists who cannot find HARMONY between science and religion that has the problem of connecting the dots.

The following is from Thomas Aquinas from the Great Books of the Western World. It can be found in the reference section of the library.

ARTICLE 2. Whether It Can Be Demonstrated That God Exists?

I Answer that, Demonstration can be made in two ways. One is through the cause, and... The other is through the effect... When an effect is better known to us than its cause, from the effect we proceed to the knowledge of the cause. And from every effect the existence of its proper cause can be demonstrated, so long as its effects are better known to us, because since every effect depends upon its cause, if the effect exists, the cause must pre-exist. Hence the existence of God, in so far as it is not self-evident to us, can be demonstrated from those of His effects which are known to us.

ARTICLE 3. Whether God Exists?

I answer that, The existence of God can be proved in five ways.
The first and more manifest way is the argument from motion.... [Newton’s second law of motion] whatever is moved must be moved by another. If that by which it is moved be itself moved, then this also must be moved by another, and that by another again. But this cannot go on to infinity, because then there would be no first mover, and, consequently, no other mover, seeing that subsequent movers move only because as they are moved by the first mover... Therefore it is necessary to arrive at a first mover which is moved by no other. And this everyone understands to be God.

The second way is from the notion of efficient cause.... There is no case known (nor indeed, is it possible) in which a thing is found to be the efficient cause of itself, because in that case it would be prior to itself, which is impossible.... Now to take away the cause is to take away the effect.... Therefore it is necessary to admit a first efficient cause, to which everyone gives the name of God.

The third way is taken from possibility and necessity... [or] to be or not to be. ...If everything is possible not to be, then at one time there could have been nothing in existence. Now if this were true, even now there would be nothing in existence, because that which does not exist only begins to exist by something already existing. [FACT: Matter can not be destroyed nor created; at most it changes form i.e. solid, liquid, gas. Physical Law: the first law of Thermodynamics.] Therefore, if at one time nothing was in existence, it would have been impossible for anything to have begun to exist; and thus even now nothing would be in existence -- which is clearly false. Therefore, not all beings are merely possible, but there must exist something the existence of which is necessary.... Therefore we must admit the existence of some being having of itself its own necessity, and not receiving it from another, but rather causing in others their necessity. This all men speak of as God.

The fourth way is taken from the gradation to be found in things. Among beings there are some more and some less good, true, noble, and the like. But “more” and “less” are predicated of different things [like a match in comparison to the sun]... Therefore there must also be something which is to all beings the cause of their being [a Supreme Being], goodness, and every other perfection. And this we call God.

The fifth way is taken from the governance of things. We see that things which lack knowledge, such as natural bodies, act for an end... Hence it is plain that they achieve their end not by chance, but by design. Now whatever lacks knowledge cannot move towards an end, unless it be directed by some being endowed with knowledge and intelligence, as the arrow is directed by the archer. Therefore some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are ordered to their end; and this being we call God.

Harmony does exist with the right religion and science. Good luck on your search.

Answer 2

Genesis 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

This sounds like there was nothing rational at the beginning of the universe. However, the Spirit of God was already in existence.
In the physical realm, there was nothing.
In the Spiritual realm, there was God.

Answer 3

Creating computers and people to answer his questions.God=>Universe . Neither here nor there but everywhere. All inclusive. That which was, is and what will be. All of the knowledge of all time and that which is contained within and without.= Everything

Answer 4

Physics predicts what? Where did you read that physics predicts that "at the beginning" there was "nothing rational"?

This question and it's details are incomprehensible. I don't know what you're trying to figure out or what you're trying to explain. Please rephrase in understandable English.

Answer 5

God is outside time and space so theyre wrong They cant reach to where He is so they cant know everything....HE MADE DEVERYTHING WE SEE JUST LOOK AROUND...IT DOESNT TAKE A SURGEON to figure out that creation demands a creator