is George W. Bush ; then what was it ? Clinton cried ; moaned;wailed & became confrontational when Wallace asked him a simple, calm question . If Clinton had to put up with 1/10 of what President Bush has been put through by the liberals - he would dissolve like the Wicked Witch of the West in the Wizard of Oz . Clinton needs to get a grip .Thank God we have a man in the White House and he knows what to do !
2006-09-24 13:00:46 · 16 answers · asked by missmayzie 7 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
To "Aan" down there..you saw the "whole clip" on utube? That's why they call it a "clip". Try watching the whole interview now .
2006-09-25 10:10:01 · update #1
Clinton lies , gets caught , gets pissed , blames others , and keeps on lying .
All he needed to do was tell Sudan ," Sure , I'll take him , we want to talk to him " and Sudan would have turned him over .
2006-09-24 22:43:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I honestly hope you read into literature as much you read into body language...
As a matter of fact, I just youtubed the whole of the clip on Fox twice - the first time doing so since the incident. I can assure you that, Clinton wasn't crying or moaning. He used an immense amount of for someone, who pretty out of nowhere, within the first ten seconds of the questions context, got blamed for 9/11...if someone came to you, and straight said "Why did you help kill this person...tell me you wouldn't get defensive.
Chris Wallace is lucky Clinton only touched that notebook and was calm enough to go extensively into all of his details...becuz if that was me, I would've hit square in the friggin jaw...he's too small a man to smirk and attack peoples characters....wouldn't even look Clinton in the eye....Cowardly sonofa.....
2006-09-25 08:59:01 · answer #2 · answered by Aan 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Obama has greater conserved demeanor, yet it rather is not any longer significant right here. i individually supply invoice Clinton dissimilar credit for that interview. I applaud him for safeguarding himself against bogus assaults from Wallace and Fox that could desire to be directed on the Bush administration. They tried to blame invoice Clinton for 9-11, whilst it replaced into Bush who disregarded the August 2001 checklist entitled "Bin weighted down desperate to attack in the U.S", a checklist given to Bush on the same time as he replaced into on holiday i could upload. It replaced into Bush who did no longer carry a unmarried assembly on terrorism from inauguration day till 9-11. It replaced into Bush who denied the validity of the N.I.E checklist from Hans Blix and the Un weapons inspectors. It replaced into Bush who had a protracted-lasting employer dating with the Saudi Bin Ladens. I firmly help invoice Clinton in that interview. Chris Wallace and the entire Fox information community have no pertaining to my political ideals. yet to respond to your question, Obama is plenty greater powerful at bridging the divide between the events. yet, i do no longer choose Chris Wallace or the different republican at Fox to tell me that.
2016-12-12 14:22:02 · answer #3 · answered by briana 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who really cares about Chris Wallace! This was the biggest interview he'd handled in years. He had to create some sort of controversy. Especially since he's really no more than a has-been. Anyway, that's what he is paid for;
and as for your question, I'd take Bill Clinton any day over George Bush. And as far as Bill doing "dirty things" behind the scenes, I thought that b.s. nonsensical rhetoric was over and done with. Besides, those "dirty things" he did behind the scenes were the same "dirty things" done by that stupidarse Lewinsky character who was as much an adult at Bill was. Whatever he did was between his wife and him. NOT us. It was your sex-obsessed government leaders who decided to act like they were so perfect and so clean so as to never have a bj given by anyone other than their wives that started the whole time-consuming nonsense anyway. . I just wish that Bill Clinton had stood his ground and told all of those republican turds that whatever he did wasn't any of their business.
You know, something like what that Bill O'Reilly did, when he said he wasn't going to talk about HIS sexual exploits..you know..all of that "dirty" talk crap to a woman not his wife...you know...and other "dirty things".
2006-09-24 14:28:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Old Bill is starting to show his true colors. While in office he showed his Southern charm while doing really dirty things behind the scenes. Of course there was no one in the media with enough balls to challenge him. After all they are all liberals. The show about 9/11 finally stirred up at least some of the facts.
That's why he is livid. I for one, enjoyed seeing that smug facade crumble.
2006-09-24 13:14:55 · answer #5 · answered by groomingdiva_pgh 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
We have a man who knows what to do, you stupid twit! Sept 11 happen while your hero was in office. He has tap danced on the bones of those who died 9/11. He has raped the constitution; and he has made it alright to hate in the name of God. And Clinton needs to get a grip.
2006-09-24 13:12:59 · answer #6 · answered by Robert D 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I'm sorry where is the MAN in the White House who knows what to do?
For the last 6 years there's been an idiot living there occasionally....when he's not on vacation and he's been screwing up royally.
Give me Clinton any day of the week...tantrum or no tantrum....cigar or no cigar.
2006-09-24 15:04:40 · answer #7 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Clinton blames everyone else but himself for his problems. It is always the right wing. This man is a narcissist.
2006-09-24 14:52:55 · answer #8 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
This is the THIRD time you have asked the same question, What reaction do you want.!!
Over-reacted? No! I don't think so. Wallace falsely accused Clinton of screwing up the operation to kill Bin Laden and implied that he didn't do enough. Clinton, quite rightly, got angry and gave Wallace a dose of reality. I would get angry too. Why should he be blamed for everything? Wallace was shockingly biased and prejudiced as an interviewer. Wallace got what he deserved !!!
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AteJrCmEcCJLbSklEVvzqJLsy6IX?qid=20060924154330AAnhvlE
First time you asked.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Akkth.uJkkFrWejQ0dVIG6Hsy6IX?qid=20060924150414AABnoLR
second time you asked.
all within an hour
Saved, i doubt you even watched it.
So what " dust " have you been sniffing!
2006-09-24 13:03:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 6⤋
Not true. Clinton was tired of everyone bashing him. Bush isn't responding because he's too moronic to comprehend what is going on (his advisers choose not to expose him to the negativity and tell him to "be optimistic"). If Clinton is "weaker" than Bush, tell me, why did the terrorist wait til Clinton was out of office to attack?
2006-09-24 13:11:00 · answer #10 · answered by BUDDY LUV 3 · 2⤊ 5⤋