2006-09-24 12:48:31 · 11 answers · asked by Carissa 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Family
Greatly depends. It seems that should always be the case, but each state has their own standards. In the state of Colorado it has to be stated in the reliquishment papers and agreed by the mother in order for child support to be stopped. It stops some dads from saying screw it, I dont want to pay so I will just sign off on the situation.
2006-09-24 13:11:31 · answer #1 · answered by okitty_kat 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it does. He's legally giving away every right he has as a father to these children. That means that by law he would have no say so as a father or parent anymore and is not obligated to take care of them seeing that he has no rights to them anymore. He would only be their biological father meaning that he's just their father by birth. Of course the court needs to approve this first. If he has not done this then he is responsible for paying child support until he signs away his rights.
2006-09-24 13:02:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he does not pay it if he has no suitable. although, you may approve him signing off his rights(do no longer do it) or, in some states, unquestionably have somebody prepared to undertake the youngster with whom you would be married in the previous you may do so. i won't be able to substantiate if i don't be attentive to the place you're nevertheless ;) additionally, make certain you start up documenting those threats, you do no longer want him granted visitation rights if he's have been given a violent character, the state will set it up so he won't be able to see the youngster with out state supervision and could pay baby help. Make copies of voicemails he might bypass away, do no longer erase text cloth messages or e-mails, that form of element. checklist his telephone calls in case you may. be careful! If he's violent he might take place in a dismal alley sometime and take a examine out to wreck the toddler in the previous that is born. that could be a sturdy element which you're actually not mutually anymore, that isn't the form of rolemodel you want for a baby. sturdy success!
2016-10-17 22:01:57 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would think so cause he's basically saying that he is uninterested in the child's life and if his ex-girl found a guy and married him, that guy could file for joint custody with the wife and the original father would have no objections since he signed his rights away.
2006-09-24 12:51:51 · answer #4 · answered by scorpion187us 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that when they sign away their rights to the child, he's not obligated to pay. I'm just assuming without researching, though.
2006-09-24 12:54:20 · answer #5 · answered by ♥i KnwUc It♥ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, if the court rules that his parental rights are severed. If not, then he still is responsible for the children, including financially.
2006-09-24 12:52:03 · answer #6 · answered by basketcase88 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would think it means that. You should really be asking the court that. Really he is saying that he is no longer interested in your children.
2006-09-24 12:55:37 · answer #7 · answered by heath 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yup.
2006-09-24 13:02:01 · answer #8 · answered by rudee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IF THE COURT ACCEPTS IT.
2006-09-24 12:50:53 · answer #9 · answered by nwnativeprincess 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think so
2006-09-24 12:50:41 · answer #10 · answered by sexylittleangel06 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋