What are the scientific proofs of the existence of "jesus christ" about 20 centuries ago?

Question

Please don't quote the "bible" because it is ink on paper - not a scientific proof.

I am asking for REAL SCIENTIFIC proofs about the existence of that person named "jesus christ" about 20 centuries ago.

For your information, History is not a science.

Don't be off-topic: I am talking about the human "jesus christ" and nothing else.

Shrouds? Bits of cross?
Well, scientific investigations can be done on this. Then?

Answer 1

Don't they have pieces of the true cross in about a billion places? And what about those shrouds and dish towels with the Lord's face on them? Or the picture of St. Mary that appeared under a bridge in Los Angeles a few months ago? Gosh, there's just got to be tons of proof - look at all the folks who have been killed, disabled, and reviled by Crusaders both ancient and modern! You're just putting us on aren't you. You probably have the proof under your bed.

Answer 2

Jewish historian Josephus records both the census and the birth with genealogy as a result of Herod's order. The exact date is disputed, however since the census uses etymological fixation of time rather than month, day, year as we do today. Some say the census took place during Herod's reign, meaning that Jesus would have been about two years old at the time. This is disputed because the order to kill male children was for those under two years old and thus would not have affected Jesus... meaning Joseph and Mary would not have fled to Egypt. There is also some dispute of the literal interpretation of Luke 2:2. There is concrete evidence that Jesus was born to Joseph and Mary in Bethlehem and not many learned people refute the fact because it is clearly included in the census of Herod, ordered by Herod, and continued through Quirinius.

Answer 3

There is none. None is needed. Pieces of the cross is just idol worship. The Shroud? Never mentioned in the Bible and has no importance. The only thing mentioned is the bandages, which were rolled up and left behind, after his body was destroyed to fulfill the covenant. They were likely destroyed or used on another body.

Answer 4

Can you provide scientific proof that Julius Caesar lived 2,000 years ago?

History is how the past is recorded. If history is "not a science", then you pretty much can't prove anyone from the past existed using your criteria. It is not like they had photographs and DNA samples taken.

I doubt you can prove "scientifically" that even George Washington lived, using your criteria.

Answer 5

The Chronicles of Josephus.

Ancient Roman records about Jesus trial and death.

Other ancient writings that are not Jewish or Christian that independently record Jesus life and death on the cross.

This question gets asked too many times.

Boring.....*Yawn!*

Answer 6

there is no scientific proof that any one person lived. However, there ARE tax and death records of Jesus , son of Joseph the carpenter , of Nazareth, of the line of David, brother of James.

Answer 7

You mean "historical proof." Other than carbon dating, science has little to do with it. You are looking for historical records, artifacts, etc. If you have been looking for Jesus under a microscope, don't hold your breath.

Answer 8

We got no verified DNA.
We got no hair samples for analysis.
We got no fingerprint cards that have survived.
We got no dental impressions.
You got us.
There is no scientific evidence for the actual
existence of Jesus.
We got faith, you got to have faith.

Answer 9

Prove to me He didn't exist?

Answer 10

have you tried looking around lately...Stuff didn't just pop out of nowhere... and the big bang theory is bunk and so is evolution...