English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who flew the planes if 9 hijackers turned up alive?
How did a plane hit the pentagon if its over 100' long and only made a 16' hole?
Why were the engines of the plane missing if they are made of steel and titnium with a combined weight of 12 tons, and stell and titnium has a melting point of 2700F, with the fire less then 1400F
Why was thermite dripping from the towers, How did it get there?
Why was there a 1200% Increase in AA put contracts on 9-10-01
Why was all the evidence sold to china before anybody can invegigate?
How did the cell phones work so well at such a high attitude?
Why was william rodreiez, a janitor in the building, offered millions of dallors to shut up, and to not tell people he saw bombs explosing in the basement?
Why did the towers fall at the speed of gravity?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change&hl=en

myspace.com/conspiracyalert

Any insults just proves you have no arguement.

2006-09-24 09:04:10 · 12 answers · asked by www.infowars.com 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I did read that parrot, i told u it was a bunch of **** yesturday, they are making things up with the hijackers

2006-09-24 09:23:50 · update #1

I did read that parrot, i told u it was a bunch of **** yesturday, they are making things up with the hijackers

2006-09-24 09:23:54 · update #2

oparrot:

So how many hijackers turned up alive? At least 9 of them.
False. The hijackers all died. People with the same names as the hijackers are alive. There are 288 people listed in the U.S. phone directory who have my name, and certainly there are more who are children or are unlisted.



Bunch of BS...They were caught on survallence cameras...He doesnt say that, i didnt even bother looking at Anything else, its looks like at least 90% BS

2006-09-24 09:35:24 · update #3

12 answers

your an idiot!your mindless bable of inaccurate facts is mind blowing.go back to the grassy knoll and try to find a clue,retard.
ps-LEARN HOW TO SPELL!

2006-09-24 09:14:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

AUGH! *bashes his head repeatedly against the wall*

I've posted this link in about five of your questions so far!

http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html
http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html
http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html
http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html
http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html
http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html
http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html
http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html

It's a rebuttal to 9/11 conspiracy theories. READ IT!!! If you choose to not read it, you either (a) can't read, apparently, or (b) are a fool who is basing all his wild claims on ONE side of the argument while conveniently ignoring the OTHER side.

It's called R-E-S-E-A-R-C-H man.

***

They made up what? Enlighten me.

***

Hahaha... you're going to have to do a lot better than that if you're going to go and make the claim that our government orchestrated the biggest conspiracy in the history of the planet. "They were caught on survelliance cameras." Says who? When did this happen? Why doesn't any other neutral source say that? Why isn't that confirmed anywhere? Stop making stuff up, or getting your information from people who made stuff up.

"The BBC and The Guardian have since reported that there was evidence al-Mihdhar was still alive and that some of the other hijackers identities were in doubt. This was commented on by FBI director Robert Mueller.[101] Der Spiegel later investigated the claims of "living" hijackers by the BBC and discovered them to be cases of ******mistaken identities.*******[21] In 2002, Saudi Arabia admitted that the names of the hijackers were in fact correct.[22] ******None of the hijackers have turned up alive since the September 11, 2001 attacks.******"

That's from Wikipedia. You know, a neutral source. The link is here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories#Claims_that_some_of_the_hijackers_are_still_alive

But... oh, wait... is Wikipedia in on the "inside job" too? Maybe the government told them they'd give 'em money if they posted false information on their site...

Please. Stop it.

And you didn't even bother reading anything else? Hahaha, that figures... you want to know why you didn't read it? Because you know that all of your claims can, and have, been refuted. The "controlled demolition" theory, the Pentagon "missile," Flight 93, everything. You know that if you click that link and read even a paragraph, your "conspiracy theory" will start to crumble.

The information is right there, man. If you want to keep ignoring it and believing in a totally preposterous theory, then fine, it's not like you're not allowed or anything. But the facts are right there. Stop trying to sell that BS of yours to everyone else, because it's wrong, in more ways than one.

2006-09-24 16:18:24 · answer #2 · answered by . 7 · 1 0

Nobody. There were no large passenger jets.
No plane hit the Pentagon
There were no plane engines, so none are missing
Thermite was placed there in preparation for controlled demolition
Increase puts because of inside knowledge
Evidence sold to hide the truth
There were no cell phone calls, passengers, hijackers or planes
Rodriguez offered money to hide the truth
Towers fell at the speed of gravity due to controlled demolition
Detailed 9/11 research work
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/research.html

2006-09-27 09:27:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Any explosives expert will tell you a building can't be blown up from the top down,like the towers were.It has to be from the bottom up.That's what Ramzi Yousef was trying to do.Once the top floor beams softened and collapsed,the weight just started a domino effect,Period.

2006-09-24 16:51:41 · answer #4 · answered by AngelsFan 6 · 0 0

No is no use arguing if you want to believe that. I shall stick with my eyes that saw the planes fly into the towers and into the pentagon.

2006-09-24 16:09:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Do you have any evidence supporting some of the points you mentioned? You do know that you should have something to support your argument in order for it to be valid.

How many more times do you need to ask this question?

2006-09-24 16:17:01 · answer #6 · answered by WaterfallOfDestiny 7 · 0 0

dude u have to check out this video :
http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main
Open ur eyes to reality, everyone. i know its bad what happened, but if u won't open ur eyes, then sthg like this might happen again. Peace to All.

2006-09-24 16:28:37 · answer #7 · answered by Valentino 3 · 0 0

Regardless of how many times you post this, I will still believe my eyes.

2006-09-24 18:27:16 · answer #8 · answered by Not perfect, just forgiven 5 · 0 0

*points to the "categories" bar*

The politics, world events, history, and conspiracy theory sections are that-a-way.

2006-09-24 16:07:36 · answer #9 · answered by Church Music Girl 6 · 1 0

Now that we know the truth, can you give us the real truth.

2006-09-24 16:09:32 · answer #10 · answered by charmaine f 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers