is this where science and religious theories collide?
2006-09-23 23:36:10 · 12 answers · asked by izyorke4767 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
There is no conflict here. Adam was the first of homo sapiens. God told Adam to name all the other creatures, so Adam named one of them Neanderthal. ;-)
2006-09-23 23:39:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A Neanderthal isn't a man. It is a grunting intelligent ape that scientist want to claim we evolved from. Evolution is a theory my friend. You here them mention finding fossils and dinosaur bones, but how often do you here of them finding Neanderthal bones? There is not a museum in the world that has the actual bones of cavemen, such as myself, showing the actual physical progression of evolution. Not one. Only theory. Was this planet even known as earth then? I don't know. I believe there was an Ice Age and everything was destroyed. I believe in God not the big bang theory. The bible addresses things that occurred after the Ice Age. Who is to say that God didn't create dinosaurs or the caveman? Everything from that era was destroyed so how can we have evolved from Neanderthals? Is there a scientist out there that can give an accurate account how we supposedly came from being cavemen to being the high tech civilized people we are today? Nope. The neanderthal period was destroyed and a new world and era created and put in place by God which he started by creating Adam. Peace and God bless.
2006-09-24 00:39:46 · answer #2 · answered by cave man 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Adam was the first man on earth that was a SON of God, He had a soul. The Neanderthal was a cave man that walked upright millions of yrs. ago that was NOT A SON OF GOD & DID NOT HAVE A SOUL, yes I am a Christin & I do believe in a prehistoric world. I have explain this about 15 times already, & I won't mind explaining it again on Tuesday if you want to come back.
2006-09-24 00:06:01 · answer #3 · answered by birdsflies 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well bible says the earth is not more than 4000 yrs( you must know Neanderthal age) old and dating of any thing on earth to be older than that itself says that all the characters in the bilbe are fictitious so bilbe is a good story marketed over a period of 2000 yrs nothing much.
2006-09-24 00:39:18 · answer #4 · answered by aathrey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is proof of Neanderthals but Adam is only recorded in 3 books (Torah, Koran and Bible). These books have many absurdities in them like "talking snakes, talking bushes, talking donkeys, men walking on water, unicorns, dragons etc. I don't think any of the stories are suppose to be taken as facts.
2006-09-24 00:16:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he was created to have everlasting life, with the full use of his brain. Neanderthals were likely the children of the fallen angels, whose physical makeup was different from humans. Since they were the children of beings who were solidified beings of energy, their atomic makeup would even be different.
2006-09-23 23:44:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you cant compare those two things because adam is a matter of the religion and neanderthal a matter of science.so if you believe in the one thing you cant believe to the other.
2006-09-23 23:43:16 · answer #7 · answered by Dargian 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes they do.
According to most Christians, neanderthals were in no way linked to us.
We never came from monkeys, even though we have the same skeletal structure.
2006-09-23 23:39:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, the Neanderthals didn't evolve to become the humans that live today.
2006-09-23 23:39:43 · answer #9 · answered by *duh* 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
he was a 1st human bean in this earth created by god.Neanderthal is complitily different by human people.physicaly&mentaly
2006-09-23 23:53:52 · answer #10 · answered by moon walker 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋