English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you think that do you have any scientific evidence, I'm curious to hear your point of view?

Also, before you attack the person asking this question, please read what I said, I am interested in reading your real and intelligent responses.

2006-09-23 17:13:51 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

22 answers

It's called Subjective (Inductive) Reasoning.
They accept certain facts as irrefutable. They make presumptions, based on those facts, to explain everything else.

When I was four years old, my aunt and uncle got married. I thought that after getting married women just spontaneously got pregnant. Upon asking my mother when they were going to have a baby, she said, they don't have to have a baby if they don't want to.
I used subjective reasoning to determine that if you wanted a baby, then god would make you pregnant and if you didn't want a baby; he wouldn't. After my presumption, I was in awe of the power of God. Maybe not awe, I just thought it was cool the way life worked.

2006-09-25 08:34:18 · answer #1 · answered by limendoz 5 · 0 1

The flood of Noah as believed by fundamentalists never happened. There is no evidence for a world wide flood at all. It is all childish wishing. There is evidence for a local flooding on the Caspian Sea, the origin of the flood myth. But it occurred fairly recently in geological time, tens of thousands of years, and not 65 million years ago when the dinosaurs were killed off.

It is not an attack to require scientific proof of what fundamentalists claim is true. It is not reasonable to replace science with beliefs. So no one is being attacked when they are required to submit proof of their beliefs.

So the only way that people "get to a point where they think (believe) the flood of Noah killed dinosaurs" is through ignorance and blind faith.

2006-09-24 00:21:40 · answer #2 · answered by Alan Turing 5 · 1 1

Its not in the Bible that I know of, so they try to put 2 and 2 together, and get 6.
Scientific Evidence like Frozen Elephants (maybe wooly mamoths?) were found in very good shape with flowers(buttercups?) still in their mouths suggests that they were very Quickly Frozen at a point in time in the past.
This makes me Believe that when GOD said Let their be Light, wasn't when the Universe was Created, but when GOD put Light and Heat back into the Universe. If GOD stopped all of the Light and its energys from flowing into the Universe(or just on the Earth), taking away all Heat Energy at once, everything would be Frozen in a Heart-Beat. Floods aren't the only way to put an end to something. I could be wrong, I could be right.

2006-09-24 00:25:39 · answer #3 · answered by maguyver727 7 · 0 1

Jim, was the chapter on the meteor with the flood or are we talking about 2 different books? Funny the bible doesn't mention the dinosaurs on the ark? And the Irish Rovers have the first hand information on the Unicorns, but they don't mention the dinosaurs either. Is there a test at the end of this?

2006-09-24 00:19:30 · answer #4 · answered by masterwitchphd 5 · 0 1

I think it is now widely accepted that there was more than one flood in ancient history. The flood of Noah is the most recent and as far as I know the only one mentioned in the Bible.

To me, the most likely reason the dinosaurs are gone is because of a sudden, enormous event such as a meteor striking the Earth or volcanic eruption and the resulting blocking of all light and the sudden freezing of almost all life, except in the oceans(?). This would explain the still edible morsels of food found in animals found in the frozen tundra.

2006-09-24 00:30:06 · answer #5 · answered by torchedbyangels 2 · 0 1

They have found evidence of human foot prints right along side of Dinosaurs one, in the same sediment layer.

There is most likely still dinosaurs like the one found of the japan coast.

this is something I think a person like you who is actually will to think would like.

Dr. Emery S. Dunfee, former professor of physics at the University of Maine at Farmington:

One wonders why, with all the evidence, the (Godless) theory of evolution still persists. One major reason is that many people have a sort of vested interest in this theory. Jobs would be lost, loss of face would result, text books would need to be eliminated or revised.

2006-09-24 00:23:39 · answer #6 · answered by MissionGrey 2 · 0 1

People like to rationalize their beliefs. It makes them feel calm. If you're stubborn and you've filed away a belief and don't want to ever have to question it again, you start making things up that will justify the belief, no matter how crazy. It happens all the time.

Or, Noah obviously did a poor job of rounding up all the animals. How can forget a dinosaur? They're so cool.

2006-09-24 00:21:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Well since humans never co-existed with Dinosaurs, it's fair to say that the flood Noah experienced was long after the dinosaurs went extinct.

2006-09-24 00:15:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

All the way thru our country(U.S.) fossils,not all but alot ,are jumbled and strewn about and covered in deep layers that show a catastrophic flood.Having said that,I believe there were dinosaurs around at the writing of the Bible(Job 40:17 -24 )Look at Behemoth(paraphrase)which I made along with you(man).He eats grass like an ox(herbivore like a Brontosaurus)his bones are like bronze his ribs like iron(big and tough)the river gushes into his mouth yet he is not moved(big) he moves his tail like a cedar tree (Huge tail ,that lets out the elephant and Hippo)vs.19" He is the first of the ways of God."
Makes sense doesn't it .besides Job was the oldest book in the Bible(Order doesn't mean age,if you are thinking of Genesis)I think man basically hunted them out,I.E. the ones that didn't die out.
And I think someday we will find aliving species of some kind(be it a Nessie type or whatever)

2006-09-24 01:12:39 · answer #9 · answered by AngelsFan 6 · 1 1

the only near logical reason i can think of is the fact that they found dinosaur bones high in the mountains. a dinosaur would of most likely been unable to reach such a high point on Earth's surface unless there has been a massive flood that was able to wash them all the way up to such high peaks in the mountains.

2006-09-24 00:17:52 · answer #10 · answered by dharken2 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers