English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

no, i don't think so. i'd feel so bad for the animal. when i was still a kid, i saw an actual butchering of a pig. it was traumatic for me because the pig was hanging upside down and the man slit it's throat and let all the blood collect in a pail. the pig's cries made me shiver..

2006-09-23 16:08:23 · answer #1 · answered by Riababy 3 · 1 0

If you want to survive,that's the only choice you will have in the near
future.Here is a prediction from somebody famous:

The Karma of the Middle East
Aug 15, 2006, 14:32



DEAR GMS: Do you foresee a continued escalation of the war in the Middle East involving IRAN, U.S.A. and other countries? What do you see playing out in the next 5 years and beyond and are oil and gas the really the driving factors here?

-T. Kirkpatrick



DEAR T. KIRPATRICK: In the early 80s I stated that World War III would be a Holy War and begin in the Middle East. Recently I updated this insight stating that the war would begin in stages, unlike for example, the bombing of Pearl Harbor that put the U.S. in the war. The recent Lebanon/Israeli conflict is one more of these stages that will eventually engulf the entire Middle East. The next conflict will be with Syria and then Iran. The time table of events has been running since 1948 and will continue for many more years. The main driving force is not oil rather it can be traced back to the creation of the state of Israel in ’48. As a result karma of a nation was created as the Palestine people became displaced and continue to be so. Since oil represents power and a way to exercise that power, oil is a part of the driving force but not the main one.

2006-09-24 03:50:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Of course. One, two, or three genertions ago, everyone's great or great great grandparents raised and ate their own livestock. go back a little further in time, and we were all susbsistence eaters, living off the fat of the land -- except when there was drought and famine. Nutrionally speaking, in modern lingo, the human body needs essential ingredients like omega-3's that primarily only come from animals such as fish. One can be a pure vegitarian I guess [Shiiks?], but it seems to me like the Shakers its a self eliminating practise. These: my personal reflections.

2006-09-23 16:25:25 · answer #3 · answered by kobukmike 1 · 0 0

I have been a hunter and done that many times and also had to kill and eat my chickens when I was a kid but most people would not want to do that.

2006-09-24 05:55:43 · answer #4 · answered by COACH 5 · 0 0

No thank God I can get someone else to do it for me.

2006-09-23 16:00:56 · answer #5 · answered by bramblerock 5 · 0 0

Sure... I love animals... they taste great!

2006-09-23 16:02:56 · answer #6 · answered by Mike S 7 · 0 0

ONLY if I was going to starve otherwise.

2006-09-23 18:05:12 · answer #7 · answered by Celtic Tejas 6 · 0 0

It does not get any fresher or healthier.

2006-09-23 21:02:51 · answer #8 · answered by andywho2006 5 · 0 0

yes !!! it doesn't matter who kills it ! what matter's is who's gonna cook it!!!! l.o.l.

2006-09-23 23:22:29 · answer #9 · answered by luke m 5 · 0 0

no

2006-09-23 17:55:56 · answer #10 · answered by American Idle 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers