I think what you are trying to determine is the legal status of the United States. Officially, the land the UN sits on in New York is international territory, just as Washington DC is not a state but is managed by the federal government.
Regardless, as a foreign head of state, Chavez has diplomatic immunity (as head of state, he is also the top diplomat), and as such international law protects his right to go to and leave the UN so that he can perform his duty as a head of state.
Now, both the terrotory question and the ability to come and go in peace are international law, and international law is determined by agreement between countries. So, these laws also allow the United States to travel to say, Geneva, or Vienna where the UN has a large presence in order to do what international statesmen and diplomats do.
2006-09-25 21:21:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Like the wingnut on " 700 Club " suggesting the CIA send in an operative to assassinate Chavez was not rude> Get a life
2006-09-24 21:13:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
So what is your F-ing question?
Complete a thought
Reword question and try again
Loser apologist for the America hating commie that spit and slapped all Americans in the Face
2006-09-23 16:30:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by buzzy360comecme 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why is this gettting so much attention?
So, the president of Venezuela said mean things about the U.S. president.
And...so...
what?
2006-09-23 13:00:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Zhimbo 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
it dont matter where he said it,it was very rude.
2006-09-23 17:30:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by frank m 5
·
0⤊
1⤋