What are the political implications of this?
2006-09-23 04:57:40 · 6 answers · asked by Eric Inri 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
There are no implications at all. People who built a country and fund its services make its laws - including its laws of entry.
Who cares where they came from?
2006-09-23 05:12:11 · answer #1 · answered by DAR 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I read a further study that suggests all humans came from Asia, not Africa(and I am not just saying this because I am Asian). Africa does have immigrants too. You don't think Egypt became a Muslim country on its own do you. Or that South Africa sprouted white people, like daisies? The political implications would depend on the laws of each respective country, since we cannot judge today by the actions of thousands of years ago. Most people would like to progress beyond that.
2006-09-23 12:06:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You could claim almost all nations are populated by immigrants if you go back far enough. However, a lot of the places early humans migrated too were not populated when they arrived.
If your tribe was the first human group to arrive on Australia, for example, I don't think you'd be an immigrant. You'd be a settler.
2006-09-23 12:05:30 · answer #3 · answered by timm1776 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Political implications on migration, huh.
2006-09-23 12:06:47 · answer #4 · answered by bobemac 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Pretty much, but we're not talking tribal migration in the 21st century, we're talking wholesale economic migration, out-of-control economic migration, at that. Some stoned politician said 'open the borders wide for globalization'. Well, he got his wish! LOLOL
2006-09-23 12:26:22 · answer #5 · answered by gokart121 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey Cartman....Git yer ***** *** in the kitchen and make me a pie!
2006-09-23 12:03:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋