Mathew 13:17 For verily I say unto you, That many prophets and righteous [men] have desired to see [those things] which ye see, and have not seen [them]; and to hear [those things] which ye hear, and have not heard [them].
13:18 Hear ye therefore the parable of the sower.
13:19 When any one heareth the word of the kingdom, and understandeth [it] not, then cometh the wicked [one], and catcheth away that which was sown in his heart. This is he which received seed by the way side.
13:20 But he that received the seed into stony places, the same is he that heareth the word, and anon with joy receiveth it;
13:21 Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word, by and by he is offended.
13:22 He also that received seed among the thorns is he that heareth the word; and the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke the word, and he becometh unfruitful.
13:23 But he that received seed into the good ground is he that heareth the word, and understandeth [it]; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth, some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.
Luke 8:9 And his disciples asked him, saying, What might this parable be?
8:10 And he said, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand.
That is why there are prophecies in the bible which are not 100% clear, but a strong will of faith can get you the answers.
please read a lot more at my website http://www.freewebs.com/vickykamalmaurya
2006-09-22 21:01:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by vicky India,Punjab 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
God reveals, man observes. Revelation versus science.
God is spirit (wind). God existed before and created everything we can observed. This is a belief.
There is no science that can make any claim beyond what man can observe. There is no evidence for the existence or not existence of God. It is not in the bible (what God reveal) because it is assumed. And simply put, man can not observe God (God is not a fact using the scientific method)
You either believe in the God as revealed in the bible, or you don't.
You claim "Why isn't the evidence clearer" is nonsense. It fails to follow the example that Jesus demonstrated to his disciple in the Gospel of John. From the reference, you would like they never read yet understand what Jesus had to say about belief.
If you think you can find "evidence" about God, you are wrong. Dead wrong. If you what to know about God, he has a book.
2006-09-22 19:56:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by J. 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
because there's a lot more advantageous info than you should ever care to carry close, Why do not you study theology, from even an agnostic view. it form of feels you do not desire there to be a God because you don't like the outcomes. You supply out the God of the gaps cry even with the indisputable fact that the exact same aspect for the secular international is metaphysics of the gaps, it truly is bundled into speculative quantum theories which have about as a lot info in theists eyes, as our God on your eyes. yet you attempt to declare the psychological severe floor.......bollocks to that.
2016-11-23 16:40:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, its simply more gobbledy-**** done up in fancy words. If God wants us to believe him, he will show us, not let some book that has far to many flaws and mistakes prove it for him. that's like saying gee, you have toilet paper, that means you must know how the sewer system works.
2006-09-22 19:36:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Didn't read the book. Can't say if it speaks truth or not. What I can tell you is that, if a person encounters a truth that makes them look evil, to themselves, when they fully believe that they are good, then they will deny that truth and call it lies.
2006-09-22 19:47:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope... that site lost all credibility when it delved into the realm of "reparative" therapy and changing homosexuality. When it lies so blatantly about that subject, how can I trust anything else it has to say?
2006-09-22 19:32:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
that link does not work
2006-09-22 19:29:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clear as mud pal.
2006-09-22 19:31:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
in that thay use that book as if it is proper history but it is a fairy tail the hole thing is a joke
2006-09-23 00:13:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋