I didn't vote for him....I voted against him, Kerry(only choice)
2006-09-22 10:13:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by nicole 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
I wouldn't say that voting for Bush you are now responsible for 100,000 deaths worldwide, not exactly sure where your facts are. And also this is the religion and spirituality page
2006-09-22 17:12:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by valmikey 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Thank God we have him!
I wish we could have him for another 8 Years and then maybe 8 more after that!
Yea its bush that straps on bombs and blows up women and children!
2006-09-22 21:31:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Grandreal 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
warped logic instead of tom science.
what were you responsible for when you bought that T-shirt or piece of clothing from Wal-Mart made by tiny little worker bees that aren't old enough to drive.
2006-09-22 17:12:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by chris 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Too bad I can't vote for him a 3rd time.
dang Whitey, that was funny, but ouch...harsh.
2006-09-22 17:12:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by JohnC 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I didn't vote for him and the electoral delegation from my state did not support him.
2006-09-22 17:20:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
So by responding to your question am I now resposible for everything else you type on here.
2006-09-22 17:16:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by westfallwatergardens 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not at all. 1st, we are at war with terrorism. 2nd, 100,000 is a number falsely circulated by a biased left winged media.
2006-09-22 17:11:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by normal person 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
I take it you're a left-wing liberal whacko-atheist. You reek of stupidity.
2006-09-22 17:27:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Where did you pull that stat from Gore?
2006-09-22 17:14:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by bc_munkee 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Er, uh, someone else would have killed them, I mean more, if he didn't, er sumthin.
2006-09-22 17:12:01
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋