English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

While I'm not a fan of Bush (and I'm even a Republican), I want to know who you think the Bush administration is persecuting? If you're talking about those scum bags that joined the military for the money and took off when their country needed them the most; then no, I don’t believe they have received political asylum and they shouldn't. Back when I swore in to the army, I gave my allegiance to my country and swore that I would obey the orders of the President of the United States whether I believed in the mission or not. There is a lot of stupid s.h.i.t that you have to do in the military but you do it because you love your country. As far as I'm concerned, America is better off without them here. I don't want people in my country that run like *********.e.s when times get hard. America isn't perfect, but it sure as hell beats the alternative.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_enlistment

2006-09-22 10:14:36 · answer #1 · answered by sexylatinguy23 4 · 0 3

They'd have a tough time proving their need for asylum. Under the current UN Convention for Refugees (which hasn't changed since it was created in the early 50s), a person would have to prove that they, personally, are under threat of persecution for religious/political/racial reasons.

Simply not agreeing with the government in power is not reason enough to get asylum. Some people might have tried, but probably with no luck.

2006-09-22 20:12:51 · answer #2 · answered by catwomanmeeeeow 6 · 1 0

sounds about proper, after all it really is exactly what each human being else does, it form of feels to fly proper by making use of those who in accordance to the guidelines if searching for political asylum, then you extremely supply up on the first secure position and make your bid there, yet hey then france germany etc etc have a tendency to work out it for what that's [in many circumstances] and toss them back, this kind you could reduce out the BS and are available on to the united kingdom, assemble $2 hundred.00 and get a loose domicile jointly along with your well being treated.........do not forget your umpteen relatives both. [please word it really is fairly a lot sarcasm same because the question is, unhappy yet authentic and takes position on a daily basis] council housing is granted, in accordance to a factors gadget, and believe me been there achieved that, makes you decide on to triumph over the poop out of a few one at the same time as they "leap" the line like that, and if BCC have caved or been made to cave, then merely look ahead to the flood of alternative situations to save on with........ heck they could even get criminal help so do no longer even ought to pay for a criminal specialist. am a brit residing interior the u . s . and may see the signs and warning signs of ways the united kingdom began happening the following, i ought to wager they are about 15 years behind the united kingdom immediately.........

2016-11-23 15:43:58 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

They actually have a waiting list for all Americans wanting to live in Canada. When Bush first took over they were swamped with requests from American people who wanted out. More so after the start of Bushes second term.
America is still the best place to live with or without Bush It is up to her people to change if they don't like what's going on.
Seems there are a lot of them who want to hit the road.

2006-09-22 09:46:13 · answer #4 · answered by travelonmyvacation 2 · 2 2

Only freeloaders who decided to join the military for a free handout and university education and after being told they are gonna be deployed have tried to come over here with a sob story. Absolutely disgusting, you owe the tab pay up, don't become our problem trying to live off welfare and free healthcare we have enough of our own doing that.

2006-09-26 05:09:34 · answer #5 · answered by moglie 6 · 1 0

I think that they just chose to immigrate to Canada instead of applying for political asylum.

2006-09-24 02:54:25 · answer #6 · answered by David Y 4 · 0 0

you need to look up the term "political asylum."

anyone is free to move to canada if they want to--for any reason.

2006-09-22 09:36:12 · answer #7 · answered by normal_cody 3 · 1 0

That matter has long ago been dealt with by Canadian immigration authorities, who have concluded it's not good enough of a reason.

2006-09-23 07:02:26 · answer #8 · answered by Willster 5 · 0 0

Only laughable, pathetic morons. Who are probably majorly regretting their decision when they realize that America wasnt as bad as the thought.

2006-09-22 09:35:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

First of all, don't listen to the idiot named TRAVELON something gay on the answer site. He has no idea what he's talking about!!

2006-09-25 22:44:53 · answer #10 · answered by nbr660 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers