Dear creationists, how do you explain this?

Question

Another specimen related to "Lucy" has been found, but is much more complete:

http://www.comcast.net/news/science/index.jsp?cat=SCIENCE&fn=/2006/09/21/482069.html

The lower body is very humanlike and inicates it walked upright. The upper body is more ape like.

How many half human / half apes is it going to take?

Wow! Apparently Noah's flood is the only flood that has ever killed anyone. I'm sure the people of New Orleans will be glad to hear that.

Lucy has not been debunked, and this is a brand new specimen revealed yesterday. Are you saying yesterday's news isn't current enough for the high paced work of Creation "scientists"?

Answer 1

That's pretty cool! I think that creationists ignore real evidence because they are so busy exercising their "faith"....it takes allot of "faith" to stay in that kind of lie, dontcha think? Thanks for posting that, that's really quite a discovery!

Answer 2

        i grew to become into an Atheist and have considered how different Atheists practice the misdirection trick you're training now. I actual have a scientific (desktops, biology, and drugs) coaching and studied Evolution in intensity for over 10 years at the two the college and submit-graduate stages. So, i be responsive to each and all the arguments for Evolution. regrettably, for you and those such as you, I actual have additionally considered each and all the blatant fabrication of lies on the behalf of Evolution in an attempt to make it so. properly, i'm sorry, yet needing it to be so -- and mendacity approximately it -- purely would not make it so.         Christians, and different youthful-Earth Creationists (as you call them), do no longer declare to have each and all the solutions. yet what you haven't any longer have been given -- is actual and literal evidence for the claims of Evolution. Evolutionists have diverse suppositions and theories -- yet no actual evidence. scientific rule says you want to be waiting to illustrate or word the strategies approximately which you have proposed your theories. in factor of fact, you could't. it is likewise no longer purely you. the appropriate minds interior the international of Evolution admit that they can't show or word those strategies. the very fact that Evolution claims those strategies take eons to make important transformations makes it impossible to visual demonstrate unit such transformations. What we see now can not substitute in our lifetimes nor interior the lifetimes of even a hundred generations of guys (it incredibly is two,000 years).         in short, there is no thank you to coach that the Platypus isn't the end results of clever layout. there is likewise no thank you to coach that the Platypus isn't the end results of Evolution. yet, you be responsive to, i've got actual studied each and all the info for ten years and the evidence is there for a youthful Earth while you're taking into consideration the scientific strategies in touch in the two the creation and the large Flood as defined by making use of the Bible. printed and peer-reviewed scientists on the two facets of the Evolution difficulty be responsive to the fact and have printed that reality and that evidence. Are you guy adequate to pass out and carry out a little actual analyze somewhat than purely regurgitating the comparable propaganda that each and each 12-twelve months-previous Atheist is conscious? God bless.

Answer 3

I find it humorous that every time a "new" discovery comes on the scene, evolutionists go into hyperventilating ecstasy mode, hoping that maybe this time, they actually have a shred of evidence to support their hoax. This one, as has all the others, will be proven to be nothing more than a type of ape or a full human.

Is there really evidence that man descended from the apes?

These are ones that everyone agrees are not pre-human intermediates between apes and humans.

* Homo sapiens neanderthalensis (Neandertal man)—150 years ago Neandertal reconstructions were stooped and very much like an ‘ape-man’. It is now admitted that the supposedly stooped posture was due to disease and that Neandertal is just a variation of the human kind.
* Ramapithecus—once widely regarded as the ancestor of humans, it has now been realised that it is merely an extinct type of orangutan (an ape).
* Eoanthropus (Piltdown man)—a hoax based on a human skull cap and an orangutan’s jaw. It was widely publicized as the missing link for 40 years.
* Hesperopithecus (Nebraska man)—based on a single tooth of a type of pig now only living in Paraguay.
* Pithecanthropus (Java man)—now renamed to Homo erectus. See below.
* Australopithecus africanus—this was at one time promoted as the missing link. It is no longer considered to be on the line from apes to humans. It is very ape-like.
* Sinanthropus (Peking man) was once presented as an ape-man but has now been reclassified as Homo erectus (see below).

Currently fashionable ape-men

These are the ones that adorn the evolutionary trees of today that supposedly led to Homo sapiens from a chimpanzee-like creature.

* Australopithecus—there are various species of these that have been at times proclaimed as human ancestors. One remains: Australopithecus afarensis, popularly known as the fossil ‘Lucy’. However, detailed studies of the inner ear, skulls and bones have suggested that ‘Lucy’ and her like are not on the way to becoming human. For example, they may have walked more upright than most apes, but not in the human manner. Australopithecus afarensis is very similar to the pygmy chimpanzee.
* Homo habilis—there is a growing consensus amongst most paleoanthropologists that this category actually includes bits and pieces of various other types—such as Australopithecus and Homo erectus. It is therefore an ‘invalid taxon’. That is, it never existed as such.
* Homo erectus—many remains of this type have been found around the world. They are smaller than the average human today, with an appropriately smaller head (and brain size). However, the brain size is within the range of people today and studies of the middle ear have shown that Homo erectus was just like us. Remains have been found in the same strata and in close proximity to ordinary Homo sapiens, suggesting that they lived together.

Conclusion: There is no fossil evidence that man is the product of evolution. The missing links are still missing because they simply do not exist. The Bible clearly states, “then the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.” (Genesis 2:7).

Answer 4

Why does anyone think that these things they find has anything to do with what God has said?

Genesis is the account of creation. These scientists coming up with bones and things....they can say whatever they want. They can say things are such and such an age, they can say it came from such and such a being, fine with me.

However, I will believe God's word.

Answer 5

Yep! The 3.3 million year old 3 year old was an evil sinner caught in the flood less than 6000 years ago. It all makes sense!

Answer 6

I dunno about you but I found the information presented in the above sites disturbing. It was presented with extreme Creationist bias and even goes as far as claiming that Darwinism is the cause for all wars and opression since it's introduction. That's a bit far-fetched and hypocritical of religions that murdered people in God's name and had wars for his 'holy lands' etc.

Answer 7

Good try - but it still doesn't prove anything. One expert said that if the being did utter any sounds it would, based on the tongue structure, only appeal to a chimp mother.

Answer 8

It's gonna take more than "Hard Evidence" to convince a Christian of anything.

If you really want to make an impact, get in good with one of their leaders. Then, they'll worship every word that comes out of your mouth like it was scripture.

Adder_Astros
Powerful member of the House of Light.
[]xxxxx[];;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>.
adderastros.com is temporarily down for renovation.

Answer 9

How many human-like apes is it going to take to PROVE that Adam and Eve didn't exist? That God didn't create the world, including human-like apes? How do you prove a negative?

Answer 10

A body that was quickly covered up in a flood.
That's what it says.
Gosh you are right, evidence of Noah's Ark.

Good job.