Atheists: If a god created the material and energy that we call the Big Bang, and showed no further (more...)?

Question

...interest in our universe, allowing the natural laws to do the rest, what evidence would you present to prove such a god could not exist?

Answer 1

If there was a Big Bang that created the matter and energy in the universe than such a god did exist. As long as that is the limit of your definition of the god - something that created the matter and energy.

If you want to expand your definition and claim sentience, personality, or other characteristics for the cause of the big bang - then you are merely speculating. It is a basic problem that religious people have in their reasoning.

If there must be a cause of A, then rather than just assuming a simple cause they expand to assume an intelligent being with goals was the cause, and then invent stories of that being's interaction with people and demands for sacrifice and worship.

It is as if a door closes and rather than assuming that the wind, a simple movement of air, caused it to happen, we decide that there must be a supernatural being called Hurracan who rules over the air and is angry with us, therefore he caused the door to be closed and we can only make him happy by burning incense.

Answer 2

There is no evidence against such a being, but the very nature of the beast makes the question of its existence moot. If God takes no interest in the universe, then belief (and possibly even proof) becomes pointless.

Answer 3

If you state your question as a scientific theory, it would fail very quickly...

If such an entity existed and you are a theist, then it (a god) did not allow the natural laws to do the rest.

Since you can not prove a negative, you must prove the existence of something.

No proof = No god....

Hey, that's what I'll put on the T-shirts!!!!!!

Answer 4

no longer which you will care or comprehend the version, however the great Bang (technically, an instantaneous after the great Bang) is what we've empirically defined simply by fact the initiating of our ordinary universe simply by fact it promises a organic boundary on the instant volume and bounds of scientific analyze. a million. the form is rather genuine as we nevertheless can bump into the easy and sound created by the explosion (it extremely isn't any longer a hypothetical journey simply by fact it left actual data). 2. all of us be attentive to that the physics of our universe carry authentic back to that factor. 3. we can not talk authoritatively of the phyiscs that defined issues earlier the great Bang simply by fact the easy produced by the explosion (great Bang) is so severe that it extremely is obstructing our view and, hence, our potential to work out what replaced into occurring in the previous in time. 4. in spite of everything, no person has ever claimed that the great Bang got here from no longer something. purely simply by fact we will not see backstage on the 2d does no longer recommend that there is a yellow brick toad in the back of it which will carry approximately a genuine Wizard of oz..

Answer 5

Keep trying to prove to yourself that there is a god and eventually you will figure out that he does but only in the mind of the believer. Do I need to say it again. Religions and all religions are creations of man to control man. Now for the big bang thing, that is one way of trying to explain part of the history but it is not set in stone. The big bang as they say did not happen just once. It has happened more than the one we are in now. This universe will seas to exist one day and the cycle will begin all over again.

Answer 6

You cant prove there is no easter bunny, tooth fairy, god, or santa claus. Why is it that you dont require proof of non-existance for the others, but you do for your sky-god?

Of course, mountains of medical, scientific evidence prove that consciousness, memory, desire, anger, jealousy, love, and other traits attributed to your god are functions of the brain. Believing that a brain existed before the rest of the universe is even more "out there" than believing in the toothfairy.

Answer 7

I have no prove that god does not exist. I think that if people wish to believe that a "god" created the big bang then great! At least then we could all agree on things like evolution.

Answer 8

I wouldn't. I can't disprove God, since he by definition would be supernatural. If God, for instance, created a rock, what geological composition would it have? What age would that rock appear to have according to scientific methods? Would God have altered time so that the rock actually existed all along, in a new timeline?

See, God (supernatural) and science doesn't mix well.

Answer 9

None, but what would it matter? If god has no impact on the universe after its creation isn't it easier to just not worry about him? There is no way that that possibility can be proved or disproved, and since it would mean nothing either way, why bother?

Answer 10

bobkgin....
First off it is YOUR responsibility to prove that something exists which you purport to beleive in. Not my responsibility to disprove it.
Secondly, laws of physics state that matter and energy cannot be created nor destroyed, but only converted into other forms. Therefore, youre wrong. God doesnt exist. Period. End of discussion.