2006-09-22 04:01:38 · 5 answers · asked by ezlayedback 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No, it is not the same thing at all. If it were, the entire Sistene chapel would be covered in porn. Nudity has held a place in art for a long time. It is often misunderstood as sexual, when actually it isn't.
2006-09-22 14:34:05 · answer #1 · answered by Dave 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is generally considered porn when the picture either depicts a sexual act (i.e. between 2 or more persons or possibly an act of masturbation) or is perhaps in a vulgar pose.
So, NO not necessarily, a nude is generally just erotic or perhaps simply artistic.
2006-09-22 11:27:41 · answer #2 · answered by Norman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2006-09-22 11:23:05 · answer #3 · answered by tim 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is all a matter of opinion. Legally, porn is graphic sex and nudity without sex is art.
2006-09-24 13:55:51 · answer #4 · answered by phantom stranger 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would think so ,pornagraphy is being naked
2006-09-22 11:18:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋