According to the evolutionist, dinosaurs lived millions of years ago, before the human race. So why do we get dinosaur and human footprints together. Go check out www.drdino.com. Did you know that dinosaurs were seen in the late 80's in the Kongo swamps. Yes thats right. How can that be. Didnt dinosaurs live millions ago??? Yip, creationist 10 - evolutionist 0
2006-09-22 03:28:12 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The tracks have been proven to be a hoax. The sightings have never been verified.
Evolutionists everything, creationists null-and-void.
2006-09-22 03:31:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Try researching some real scientific sites. The sites by creationists are of course going to have all the hoaxes and false information.
You know even of somehow they found a pocket of living dinosaurs (scientists would love that - read ones to study - would answer the warm blooded and feathers questions) it wouldn't mean evolution is wrong - just that there was an area that couple sustain a small population of dinosaurs. Like cryptozoology - real scientist have said they would love to see someone actually find these things - fossil evidence, skin - real physical evidence- but until they do they just cant put validity in to it.
If you are going to find a scientist to validate creationism try a somewhat reputable one. Robert Bakker - the paleontologist (dinosaur expert) believes in some type creation - no young earth - no discrediting evolution - just more of ID type thing with something guiding evolution. Dr. Dino just falls apart with very little scrutiny and really is just a joke.
Evolutionists 1,000,000 - Creationists 1
2006-09-22 04:14:36 · answer #2 · answered by Sage Bluestorm 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no longer all species have been wiped out... as a rule in simple terms the biggest ones. This gave mammals, consisting of human beings, an threat to adapt because of the fact the main deadly predators now no longer existed. it could have been magnificent if dinosaurs developed a 2nd time, astronomical. Evolution is pushed with the aid of mutations, this suggests that threat performs a functionality in progression. there is not any longer some end purpose (like growing to be a super carnivore).
2016-10-15 07:20:46 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you go to other creationist web sites, and search for 'dinosaur human footprints', you will find that even other creationists liars say not to take Dr. Dino, or Dr. Baugh's Glen Rose footprint hoax, seriously.
For a detailed analysis, see: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy/tsite.html
"I recently challenged the Institute for Creation Research to come to Glen Rose to reexamine the "man tracks" on the Taylor Site. John Morris took me up on this challenge, and, along with representatives of Films for Christ (invited by Morris), met me in October and November of 1985 at the Paluxy sites, where we viewed and discussed the evidence together. As a result of these meetings, ICR recently published an Impact article,[16] admitting that the Taylor Trail appears "obviously, dinosaurian," and that "none of the four trails at the Taylor Site can be today regarded as unquestionably human." Also, Films for Christ has taken Footprints in Stone out of circulation. However, ICR's Impact article evades a frank admission of past mistakes by downplaying the original claims, by emphasizing a number of alleged "mysteries" about the tracks, and by selectively omitting much of the information that makes it clear that all of the Taylor Site tracks are dinosaurian. A more detailed review of this article is found in my article "Recent Developments in the Paluxy Controversy." Further documentation of the Taylor Site and other sites alleged to contain human tracks is found in my monograph on the Paluxy controversy." ~ Glen J. Kuban
2006-09-22 03:34:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Go check out Wikipedia, you'll find undoctored information there that you can come back and argue against.
Also, that 'dinosaur' found in the 80s. It was a basking shark carcass that had decayed. That was proven by shark experts.
The footprints were hoaxes.
My question to you is - are you ever going to stop asking these questions.
lol, and yeah like that other guy said - don't breed.
2006-09-22 04:01:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Um, possibly because you dont have to be there at the same time to make footprints that are side by side?
O rly, well, if anyone has bothered to photograph or capture one of them, let me know. What looks like a dinosaur doesnt mean its a dinosaur. There are worms when threatened, flip over and they resemble a poisonous snake.
and please, dont take Hovind as your source becuase...1, he doesnt even have a doctorate degree in science. doctorate does not mean doctor in the medical terms. 2, his training for doctorate degree was from a non-recognized school by the US standards.
2006-09-22 22:25:37 · answer #6 · answered by leikevy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kent Hovind (Dr. Dino) is so full of it. He claims to be a scientist... he is not. His videos are full of nothing but conjecture, scripture, and quotes taken way out of context. Hovind believes that the teaching of evolutionary theory is the cause of all of societies ills. He has an agenda to remove it from the educational system and will do just about anything to do so. He is also a proponent of pseudoscience and conspiracy theories. Not only this but he is a hypocrite. He rants on and on about the U.S. using his tax dollars to fund lies [evolution], yet he is currently under several indictments for tax evasion.
The man is crazy, his information is worthless.
2006-09-22 03:45:59 · answer #7 · answered by ChooseRealityPLEASE 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'd be more inclined to accept evidence from some one who doesn't have an axe to grind. Also, their research seems a little dated. My daughter loves dinosaurs and I noticed that the articles on this site neglected to mention several important developments from recent years. Until they can take those into account I'll have to conclude that they are selectively "disproving" theories based on faulty data.
2006-09-22 03:37:01 · answer #8 · answered by Jensenfan 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
thats called a hoax people are just trying to screw with you. just like bigfoot or the lochness monster and this could be that people like you are trying to put down the evolutionary theory but once again this is a hoax and dinosaurs and humans never lived at the same time. just think if they did wouldn't we have records of some ancient people of some "monsterous beasts"
creationist 0-evolutionist 10
p.s don't have kids
2006-09-22 03:32:59 · answer #9 · answered by crl_hein 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Define dinosaur.
2006-09-22 05:31:21 · answer #10 · answered by ZombieTrix 2012 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Find this info on an actual science site, not a Christian Propoganda site, and I'll believe it. Christian organizations have lied too much since the formation of the Catholic Church for me to believe it just because a Christian Organization said it!!!
2006-09-22 03:36:05 · answer #11 · answered by Byron A 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋