The correct spelling is "nuclear waste." The answer to your question is no. Rods in water-cooled nuclear reactors is Uranium 238. When it degrades to U235 it is said to be "spent." Only 5% of the energy from fission is achieved this way.
Enriched plutonium means taking a material which includes plutonium and removing anything that is not plutonium, kind of like removing slag from iron ore to get iron.
There are reactors on the drawing boards that actually create plutonium as a by-product. These systems are very efficient, use cooling by helium instead of water, and are much safer. Countries won't build them because of the fear the plutonium will be stolen and made into bombs.
2006-09-22 01:35:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I suspect you're referring to the reaction control rods used in various types of nuclear reactors. I'm no authority on the subject, but my understanding is that these are carbon, or graphite rods inserted into a nuclear "pile" to control the reaction of the nuclear material. Controlling how deep or shallow the rods are inserted has an effect on the material itself. Enrichment of plutonium (or any radioactive element) means converting it to a more radioactive isotope. This can be done to "weaponize" it, or to make it literally more hot. The latter is done to make it more effective at heating water, and generating the steam which spins a turbine; generating electrical power.
2006-09-24 11:43:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
enriched plutonium is ready to be used as power, plutonium is a mined material is like oil being turned into gasoline and the enriched plutonium is the gasoline. recylying the plutonium is to keep it for as long as posssible squeezing out at the life of the material, we don't do that because it we can afford to buy/make more and not lose productivity from the material
the actual waste from plutonium power generation is the radioactive water that is used to cool the rods
2006-09-22 01:29:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Justin K 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. the enrichment of uranium into plutonium is very complicated and difficult to do.
2006-09-22 01:26:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by bradthepilot 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Low-Radioactive water, that is. It keeps the water warm longer! Not really a waste, that, you just have to position the plant carefully.
2006-09-22 01:35:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by dane 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nuclear "waist"?! Wow, that's a good figure! I wish I had one.
2006-09-22 02:41:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by mindrizzle 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
in spite of the fact that nuclear means provides for the potential desires of the destiny, in spite of if that's no longer a "eco-friendly" potential. The social fee all of us ought to pay interior the destiny outweighs some super reward of nuclear flora / nuclear potential, taking the training from our previous stories with nuclear plant worldwide. on the different hand, greater R&D must be channeled into areas of wind, image voltaic, & water potential technology. the foremost be conscious right this is determination "eco-friendly" potential. in spite of everything, we in user-friendly terms have one million earth and that's obvious to all those that polluting it greater might in user-friendly terms effect in killing ourselves and our destiny generations. in user-friendly terms "eco-friendly" potential ensures our & destiny generations' persevered existence in this one and in user-friendly terms homestead we've; Earth. As in all advancements, preliminary progression expenses are severe yet as we strengthen and circulate in direction of "eco-friendly" potential, there is continuously a tipping factor the place "eco-friendly" potential turns into economically achievable potential. in addition to, how can human variety commerce-off the fee of coming up sparkling potential against the time-honored actuality of organic adverse environmental outcomes of nuclear flora ? There should not be a attention of coming up greater nuclear means flora in any respect, interior the face of actuality of the undesirable outcomes to the ambience. "eco-friendly" and sparkling potential must be pursued because of the fact the destiny potential answer for the destiny.
2016-10-15 07:16:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-09-22 01:26:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
These articles should help.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOX_fuel
2006-09-22 01:58:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋