If you could chose1 person to oversee the worlds affairs instead of 1 per country .who wud u chose and why?

Question

do you think this would help towards an end to war

this person does not have to be alive or even real ..

Answer 1

If he need not be alive then it is gandhi he is only person who is selfless ( he didnot choose to become prime minister of india eventhough he could) he asked the governamnt not to hang the person who killed him,the person whould have been killed immidetly by the crowd surrounding him,(the person was hanged becos the gov ignored gandhis last wish gandhisam died with gandhi)
and he is a great leader his one word stopped hindhu muslim roits in india.He is responsible for bloodless freedom for India, bloodless freedom for south africa and his ideology is responsible for winning back the rights for balcks in america
If any one any one with this quilities exists right now then he can be the world leader.

but sorry there is no one like this not even near thse quilities,
i tell you one thing some one said he likes God to rule if thre is a chance as a answer to your question, but i feal sorry to say that twice god came to rule this world Once Chirst (I am not a chiristian) and second time Gandhi and both times we killed him.

i donot think god will atke birth any more till this world ends.

thank you.

Answer 2

There is no one person capable of overseeing the world's affairs. This because the world is diverse, and no matter what solution you propose there would be people who disagree. War is not a product of government policy specifically, rather it is a part of human nature. Don't misunderstand I am not saying that war is necessary, or that governments don't institute futile wars. Rather that there always have been wars, and always will be. This is just an unfortunate reality. Additionally, you have to remember the statement that absolute power corrupts absolutely. No matter how pure the person you chose would be starting out, power changes people's perceptions.

Just for the sake of argument though.
My choice: Dean Martin - Then the whole world could be like a Vegas lounge. Press conferences would be like a high priced Vegas show. If were going to hell in a handbag anyway, we might as well be entertained along the way.

Answer 3

This is not who I would choose, but how the choice would be made.

First, I would allow the Governator to be elected President of the United States.

Next, I would take all world leaders and lock them in an empty room at the UN Headquartes in NYC, and have them elect a single person to become the supreme chancellor, or whatever. If they are unable to come up with a single person voted on unanimously (please do NOT let the election be administered by the fine folks at the Florida Election Commission) by all the leaders after a week, then they all have to fight for it, and the last one standing is the new world leader.

I think it would take something like the Earth being invaded by aliens (no, not the kind from Mexico) to have everyone stop fighting over oil (or all this my god is better than your god stuff ) and come together for the good of mankind.

Answer 4

Well heck...I am surprised no one else had this answer...Everyone knows the one person you would choose (notice the question asks who would YOU choose) would be YOURSELF!

I am no different, I would choose myself because, frankly, I don't trust anyone else to do it right.


BTW: After about a week, I think I would resign and give control back to the world leaders (misleaders) because I would be so stressed by their collective ignorance and their petty bullcrap that I would have to step down, after i built a self sustaining homestead on some very remote island in the pacific to live in with my family!....

Really, great question but...beyond yourself who else would anyone trust?
Mother Theresa? Ghandi? Dali Lama? ...I don't trust them! I trust me! and my Wife :) maybe my mom and dad....perhaps it should be a family thing.....like the Mafia :))

Answer 5

If I had to choose just one person, which I think is bad idea, than would choose Former President Jimmy Carter because of his brains, guts, and morality.

Answer 6

Since, this is a Fantasy question, I would chose,
General, George S Patton, he was an excellent diplomat.

Answer 7

you won't be able to have peace at the same time as poverty exists, so there is not any aspect in figuring out on between both. Wars are oftentimes between the "haves" and the "have nots." So figuring out on international peace ability figuring out on an end to poverty. it truly is what i decide on. I also decide on appropriate spelling.

Answer 8

There is no such a person because the world is full of hatred and mistrust. We are more than ever aware of our differences than our similarities. Thanks in large part to the religious zealots on all sides.

Answer 9

OMG imagine the power this person would have. I dont think there is any person who could do that job and not be corrupted by the power.

Answer 10

The Dalai Lama.
He understands peace more than anyone else, he is highly intelligent, and he already has experience of running government.