It seems to me that the rate of ecological imbalance can be possibly be reversed by granting voting rights to other eligible animals. A suitable technique would be needed to determine the prferences and the voting mechanism for this purposes. Can it be made possible?
2006-09-21 20:50:21 · 11 answers · asked by orsel 2 in Environment
Animals can be first elected to animal chamber and then selected for the purpose of nomination to virtual key posts of their intrests. If we have virtual human heads of governments than why should it not be made possible for animals.
2006-09-21 21:37:03 · update #1
No man will not be ruled by beetles, they would just want space enough to accomodate. Many of them live at such places where man doesnot live. Can man hang himself the manner the birds and bees do on trees? etc. etc. They need voting rights just to ensure that lest man should be left with human votes alone leaving nothing else for him.
2006-09-22 01:30:07 · update #2
Very good imagination. It might be possible but it sounds far-fetched. Also, if animals can only vote but not get nominated that is discrimination. You know, you should write a story about this actually happening.
2006-09-21 21:09:44 · answer #1 · answered by Hardrock 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its no longer achieveable for the fact an animal does no longer be responsive to what that's vote casting for. Animals are extremely clever sure, yet they do no longer examine and comperhand. At no factor in time would they even think of they have been vote casting on something. All they might think of is 'will i'm getting nutrition if I %. the mind-blowing one?' that's a mind-blowing theory, yet purely does no longer be achieveable. till a actual Dr. Dolittle grew to become into born.... and not considered one of those pretend puppy psychic.
2016-10-01 05:56:20 · answer #2 · answered by laseter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ya, from now, pigs will demand votes and will give offers to stay in mud for 3 days 2 nights if we vote them.
Good enough. Doggies in place of Bush! Cats in place of Osama!
2006-09-21 21:12:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol....Actually, the same question was asked, but about women.
Women were apparently "not intelligent enough" to make the "right choice."
When women got national suffrage, many heads of households (men) just forced the women (wife, daughter) to vote for whatever he wanted.
I could see forcing my goldfish to vote for Hillary Clinton.
2006-09-21 21:09:57 · answer #4 · answered by Double Century Dude 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If democracy should include all animals ,birds and bees we will be ruled by beetles.I think they are the majority.Am I right?
2006-09-22 01:15:02 · answer #5 · answered by Padmini Gopalan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you should check into the nearest hospital and get a mental examination.
2006-09-28 11:37:06 · answer #6 · answered by AL 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not know a lot about the subject so I consulted with Sammy who is my dog.
He said: guau, guau.
I understand he is in favor!!!
2006-09-29 07:39:11 · answer #7 · answered by Dr. J. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well sure,why not?Vote for Fido!
Forty acres and a fire hydrant!
2006-09-21 23:17:17 · answer #8 · answered by moebiusfox 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
are we talking like just mammals? or just inteligent animals? because otherwise thats discrimination
2006-09-21 20:58:33 · answer #9 · answered by Jeff H 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
with the same manifesto as humans
2006-09-23 05:28:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋