LAS VEGAS STUDMAN, et.al, why does the Bible call science, FALSELY SO-CALLED?

Question

Science is a process of experimentation and observation, in order
to come to logical conclusions. Yet scientists don't accept their
own test results if they don't go along with their preconcieved
ways of thinking.
Here's my case against science.
In California there is a crack in the Earth called the San Andreas
Fault. Where they expect a massive earthquake at any time. 100
miles away in Nevada. "Scientists" were detonating multi-kiliton
nuclear devices "underground" for decades!
I REST MY CASE.
Last time I wrote this, some "DIM-WIT" said, "What do you mean
you rest your case?" "There was no scientific thought in that!"
MY POINT EXACTLY!

Answer 1

One thing I will mention since the question is?? The San Andreas fault was in California long before the bombs were in Nevada. It was nice when they started testing them underground...didn't help the people who got ate there dust, John Wayne among them. Look up a few sites on St. George Utah, Our country's capital for thyroid cancer. God did it!?

Answer 2

Maybe he is pointing out the absurdity of testing when a fult line could produce "The Big One" by using Nuclear wea[ons? Just a guess...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Although no attempts have yet been made to control earthquakes, earthquakes have been known to be induced by human interaction with the Earth. This suggests that in the future earthquake control may be possible.

Examples of human induced earthquakes

* For ten years after construction of the Hoover Dam in Nevada blocking the Colorado River to produce Lake Mead, over 600 earthquakes occurred, one with magnitude of 5 and 2 with magnitudes of 4.

* In the late 1960s toxic waste injected into hazardous waste disposal wells at Rocky Flats, near Denver apparently caused earthquakes to occur in a previously earthquake quiet area. The focal depths of the quakes ranged between 4 and 8 km, just below the 3.8 km-deep wells.

* Nuclear testing in Nevada set off thousands of aftershocks after the explosion of a 6.3 magnitude equivalent underground nuclear test. The largest aftershocks were about magnitude 5.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

n January 19, 1968, a thermonuclear test, code-named Faultless, took place in central Nevada. The code-name turned out to be a poor choice because a fresh fault rupture some 4,000 feet long was produced. Seismograph records showed that the seismic waves produced by the fault movement were much less energetic than those produced directly by the nuclear explosion. Locally, there were some minor earthquakes surrounding the blasts that released small amounts of energy. Scientists looked at the rate of earthquake occurrence in northern California, not far from the test site, at the times of the tests and found nothing to connect the testing with earthquakes in the area.

Answer 3

I enjoyed this.

First if they are so smart, let them first learn the age old bible stories and delight in telling them just because they are old. Psm.77:5; Col.1:26; Matt.1:1-17;
Exo.12:40,41; Eph.3:16-18 is 430 years from Abraham to Moses and heirs so, 470
years when they get to the Promised Land.
1Ki.6:1 and 480 more years to the 4th year of king Solomon, plus 36 1Ki.11:42 he dies. Then it is to the 391st year and Babylon captivity and 606 to Christ born under Rome.
2006 CE years ago. If they can't figure time back to Abraham, who wants to trust then with anything
They might say, or I might say, I need proof as the bible gives, so where is the science bible that can be tested as we can test out the bible.

Answer 4

What does the Bible have to do with Nuclear testing that has not occurred in decades? No one said all science was wise and good science.

Answer 5

Because they are using a magic God force-field ray to keep the ground 1 mile away from the test site from collapsing.

I REST MY CASE.

Answer 6

huh

Answer 7

i don't understand the question