Creationists: If God didn't explain DNA in the bible, does that mean the science of DNA is wrong?

Answer 1

no it just may mean that dna is not important to salvation or unity with God.

Answer 2

God didn't explain that the earth revolves around the sun in the bible, either, but we all know how that went, don't we? Of course it's not wrong. God can use DNA to make a baby. He gave you great-grandparents the dna that wouldn't be useful or show up until you. Science and Christianity are not really opponents.

Answer 3

a nicely prepared and concept out question. because no one's answering, i will take a shot. a million. We in all probability mean 'genus', yet we actually do no longer know what your definitions mean. we've not got a concern telling the version between a fowl and a crocodile, and understand that they are in a position to't mate. 2. There are some approaches to look at this. it is not that scientists are not smart (although many have agendas), yet they are in a position to be rather fooled by using an all-powerful deity. possibly god set up the international just to look this way. sure, we are terrified of nuclear weapons and power vegetation. are not you? 3. whats up, once you have in trouble-free terms have been given 6000 years to paintings with, there is rather no time for speciation to distinctive varieties. constrained time (in and of itself) is the restricting ingredient right here. We merely can no longer think of 'billions' of years. It isn't smart to the human techniques or human concern.

Answer 4

Of course not, the bible is not a science textbook.

But interesting that you mention DNA, did you know that one of the discoverers of DNA (Francis Crick) found the structures of DNA to be so complex that he concluded the theory of evolution could not explain it?

He hypothesized the theory of panspermia to explain away the apparent irreducible complexity of DNA. The idea is that our planet was seeded with a DNA bearing organism from beyond our solar system and then we evolved from there.

Answer 5

no. God provided all we need to know in the Bible.

actually, DNA points to intelegent design,

Irreducible Complexity
Life cannot exist without many numerous interdependent complex systems, each irreducibly complex on their own, bringing about a grand pageant for life to exist.


A specific example is the interdependence of DNA, RNA and protein. "DNA, RNA and proteins cannot do their jobs without the help of at least one of the other two. DNA is a library of detailed information for the various structures within the cell. It has the information for the manufacture of each protein. RNA is a copy of instructions from the DNA and is sent as a messenger to the ribosomes for making proteins. There are two types of proteins; functional proteins such as enzymes, and structural proteins, which compose the organelles . . . Living cells need all three molecules at the same time. The chance, simultaneous natural appearance of the three distinct, interdependent complex systems is just not possible."[1] Not only are these three needed for life, but an organism also needs a cell membrane, usable energy, reproduction and all left-handed amino acids. All of these requirements are just a portion of why the “first cell” is the ultimate in irreducible complexity.

Darwin's theory of numerous, successive, slight modifications simply does not work when discussing the origin of life. The problem that ultimate irreducible complexity brings to evolution is clearly daunting for evolutionists. Their way to deal with the problem is to dismiss ID as nonscientific or pseudoscience. However, when one looks at the issue of origin of life through the lens of irreducible complexity, the evidence points to design. As demonstrated in my article, "Is Intelligent Design Scientific? Part 2", when the definition of science includes ID as an option then we can see that evidence, such as irreducible complexity, clearly points to ID. To prevent ID from being discussed in the classroom or supported in scientific journals is to stifle the scientific process. It forces the square peg of data to fit the round hole of naturalism.

Answer 6

The Bible doesn't go into much detail about how life was created, just that life and we were created from the dust of the earth, as is DNA nothing but combinations of compounds made from elements, like dirt.

Answer 7

D=deutcher (apoligize no time to spell check)
N=nation
A=angels

and 2/3 angels loyal to God the fat'her(r) not Satan of hell and 1/3 loyal to a'bad'don is the real GREAT WAR OF ALMIGHTY GOD.

so the anceint gene is german not italia. And hells barger fought Deutcher angels with turn coat italia thus He could actually be a devil worshipper good for nothing but a f-ing poetry book? And a rebel to be put on the cross? but guess italia gave HIM freedom or something to fight against God. Sold His soul to a club is my guess.

Answer 8

DNA is great!
but how did it become?

It was created by God, in the creations he made from the earth!

Answer 9

Only God knows the validity of their research, but just because other "science" isn't "explained" in the Bible doesn't mean it's "wrong". I think you know the answer. C'mon...
God bless

Answer 10

I'm not a creationist... but it just goes to show that the biblke is not to be taken literally... it's a mishmash of seperately written storybooks thrown together by a bunch of men with agendas... It's as simple as that. A guide for ethics... fine... but straight and absolute truth? hell no.