to the fullest extent....
2006-09-21 12:58:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
That's a good thing in thought but its not practical.There are so many and our prisons are full now,why put more burden on the federal government with having to house and feed them.No I say pick them up and take them back to the border.If it was possible Id take then deep into Mexico and then let them go,that makes it harder for them to come right back in.Now the smugglers send them to prison at hard labor,seize all assets and go after their
connections on both sides of the border.
Soul store the land you talk about did not belong to the Indians,they were not indigenous to this continent,having migrated here from another land mass via the Bering Strait,,so they were immigrants too.No one stole the land ,they were defeated in war and the lands became the spoils of that war.No one has stolen any thing from the Indians and they were not native to this land.
There were no laws against mass immigration until 1924 so any one coming here before that could not have been illegal.stop using this inaccurate accounts of this country's history.My family came here in 1702.
I am a native born American just like all the rest of us that have been born here.I know history perhaps you should learn more about.it.
No amnesty
2006-09-21 13:06:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Yakuza 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
To the max. If I illegally try to go to Mexico (why I don't know but) I could be arrrested, fined, jailed or worse. Why should it be different for them coming here? Amnesty? I wouldn't get pardoned for committing crimes, why should anyone else? Another major problem is anchor babies. That law should be stricken from the books altogether. Not only have they committed the crime of illegally entering the country, but if they recieve welfare or food stamps, they are guilty of defrauding the government. I thought you couldn't legal get citizenship if you committed crimes? I dont have a problem with people coming here, just do it the legal way.
2006-09-21 17:03:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by mr_fixit_11 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No there is no statute of limations for Ilegels/ that would mean that every man woman and child that is not of ture natinal haritage should be prosecuted and sent back to there ansesteral home land.
This is the land of the free/in todays U.S socity where is the freedom if we dont and cant let people into this country to have the same sence of freedom that we the People of the U.S. have. What hipocrets we've become to say that this is the land of the free, people from other countries would give anything to have just 1day of freedom something we have every day. Granted we have our Boarders (fenced up) for what to keep people from comming in or is it to keep us the people of the U.S. from leaving I dont know anymore. So who's the Ilegel ones here the one trying toget in or the ones that are here now that our ansesters took from the real natives of the U.S.
2006-09-21 13:24:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Don C 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
I think they should be shot on the spot, that is my prosecution for them. They are an enemy of the USA, they are invading our nation, they are declaring a war on all of us, so war laws should be put in place now. Defend your country at all costs.
2006-09-21 19:22:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
They are already taxing our prison system with the criminals that we catch. Yes they are breaking the law, but I think building the fence and then giving people a one way ticket back to their home country is all we need to do.
2006-09-21 13:06:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
If it is their first time entering the country illegally they should be deported. If it is their second time entering the country illegally it should be shot to kill.
Our country needs to grow some balls and start defending itself on the homefront.
2006-09-21 13:13:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
They are being prosecuted already.
or do you mean like the jewish were in Eastern Europe?
The problem is Ilegals from eastern Europe ( any religion)are also in the USA,
2006-09-21 15:31:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Yussef 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
Absolutely.
2006-09-21 13:03:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by sjsosullivan 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
What country?
2006-09-22 08:55:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by frank m 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why shouldn't we prosecute criminals?
Common Sense
2006-09-21 13:13:11
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋