bad how? Bad tasting? I guess not.. but what's the point of drinking coffee that has no caffeine in it? It's like drinking non-alcoholic beer.
2006-09-21 10:44:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by ChemGeek 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, decaffinated would make a person think it has no caffiene.
This is not the case as I'm sure you re well aware. Some people can't handle caffiene anymore due to illness or whatnot for them it is good, in that they can still drink coffee. Once or twice I've drank it when I was at someones house and that was the only coffee they had and there is not much difference in taste. My personal choice is not to go with this bastardized version of the world's greatest drink. So I prefer coffee that bares a resemblance to motor oil.
2006-09-21 10:50:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Grev 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think there's a definite taste difference between regular and decaf. There are certain brands of coffee that have better tasting decaf than others. For instance, Folgers or any other supermarket brands of decaf coffee are TERRIBLE. I'd rather not drink coffee at all than drink that mud-water.
Peet's has a very good decaf and Starbucks is okay too.
2006-09-21 10:47:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by luckylab8 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
the final idea is to look after our bodies and in no way damage them with alcohol, and different addicting or negative substances. as far as decaff, i do not understand for confident, i will have a virgin pina colada considering there is not any alcohol yet we do not understand all the excuses that we ought to continually ward off espresso, so ingesting decaff may no longer be in preserving with the Lord's command. also with the foodstuff that has wine in it, properly...lots of the time the alcohol changed into burned off by cooking, and if there's a minimum volume for flavoring...properly i wager it truly is not any longer a situation, yet i do not opt to flirt with the bounds so i will oftentimes ward off it. the completed caffeine aspect is depending on the first premise. Doctrinally, the church advises hostile to caffeine yet would not implement or require abstinence from it for worthiness concerns. yet the exciting aspect is that caffeine is beginning to rear it truly is grotesque head as an fairly negative substance to human well being. our bodies were created by making use of God, and subsequently are useful presents to be cared for. Even Jesus Christ retrieved His body from the tomb. That ought to assert some thing about our earthly tabernacle's value.
2016-11-23 13:43:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by elisias 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The decaffeination process is a chemical process. The chemicals may be bad.
My mom suffers migraine headaches and decaf will trigger them. For her, it's bad.
2006-09-21 14:51:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by ramiska 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
What do you mean "bad"?
It tastes exaclty the same as regular coffee, and still only has a few calories per serving, plus antioxidants. So, it's actually good for you (in moderation.)
2006-09-21 10:41:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
There is no taste difference whatsoever from regular coffee.
2006-09-21 10:40:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by JenJen 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Caffeine is bad, in huge amounts, so what would common sense tell you, Einstein.?
2006-09-22 11:52:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Matsukaze 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Assuming that you mean bad tasting, no it is quite tasty.
2006-09-21 10:40:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by blue_eyed_soul_woman 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
if anything it might be alittle better for u then regular coffee... less caffine
2006-09-21 11:10:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dont get Infected 7
·
0⤊
0⤋