The missing link has been found!!!! Hurray!
2006-09-21 09:44:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
gee, a creationist crying hoax. I wonder why that would be....could it be because of all the HOAXES?? proven hoaxes. And for the one who said the fossil record is complete? Are ya kiddin?? Will Billions of years of supposed evolution, there should be more transitional fossils than anthing else. We should be tripping over them in the street. Just think about how many transitional beings there would have to be for every single life form on this planet to have evolved from one cell out of the promordial ooze.Fossil record complete.. THAT is funny.
2006-09-21 17:46:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Coco 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am a creationist and I am not crying hoax. I have seen many found sculls from alleged pre-man and they wound up being apes. What a coinsidence it is a fossil, Cant get DNA. wow,
You may want to check out the dvd "origins of life" It has some
X atheist scientist believing in intelligent design.
http://www.origins.org/menus/design.html
Many top scientist are moving towards intelligent design because so much of evolution does not make sense to the lerned person.
2006-09-21 17:44:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Archangel 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am a Christian, & I have never cried hoax, I believe in a prehistoric world, it is all in the bible, if people just take the time to study, ONE WORD can change that whole picture, In Gen 9:1 God told Noah to REPLINISH the earth, which means to fill it up one more time, & in Gen 1:28 God tells Adam & Eve to REPLINISH the earth or to fill it up once again. I can see God in the Pehistoric world Juding Angels & his animal kingdom, & God saw what satan had even brought to them in the prehistoric world, So I see God moving this planet far enough away from the sun to cause a ICE age, Then over millions of years, God begin to bring this earth back into a relationship with the sun. to warm it up to once again bring forth life, Now the cave man or wmona did NOT have a soul, They were the highest form in the animal kingdom, but no soul, Adam & Eve did have a soul, therefore they were Son & daughter of God. The cave man & woman that did not have a soul was NOT a son or daughter of God. Now did I blow your mind. Nw science is complaining about global warming, hogwash, God is slowly brining this plnet bck into a full relationship with thye sun to hve after the milleummium a perfect climate as it wa back in the Garden of EDEN.
2006-09-21 17:28:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by birdsflies 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
cecil if you'd bothered to atlest check the link or atleast were informed about things in the world you'd not have given such a stupid reply. The fossil is of a girl.
As regards to you thinking 3.3 million years is old why don't you check the dinosaurs are like 65 million years old.
2006-09-21 16:47:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by suresh t 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course they will. They fail to understand several very important things.
First, the fossil record is amazingly complete, and what is missing from it will in all likelihood eventually be discovered.
Secondly, even without a fossil record the case in support of evolution would still be very good based only on DNA analysis.
Third, the "error" in carbon dating has nothing to do with fossils of this age, and the radioisotope dating used in such ancient fossils is very accurate.
And finally, creationist and many Christians believe that evolution in some way diminishes them and make the world less wonderful.
2006-09-21 16:49:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by trouthunter 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
If The Christian churches would agree that cow pies are a delicacy, Christians would serve them for Sunday dinner and be offended by any guest who refused to eat at their house.
Dating methods are also refuted by christian "Scholars". Carbon 14 dating, obsidian hydration dating, silt settlement dating, there are countless methods to date fossils or other objects, when they all agree to a certain degree, the logical answer is the dating is correct. But then again, logic was never a strong point in religious thinking.
2006-09-21 16:45:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Science vs Religion?? Seems like you're comparing Double cheese Whoppers and iPods.
Since when are Creationists expected to reason? It's BLIND FAITH that moves them.
I know you're having a ball when you turn those dorks on. I really hope it's fun you're after, cause you're not changing anyone's mind.
AWESOME ARTICLE, I found it extremely interesting, and I thank you Kenny for sharing such important information.
HAIL KENNY!!
2006-09-21 16:49:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by foundationshaker 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
No one can count to 3.3 million, so how can it be 3.3 million years old?
2006-09-21 16:44:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by The Resurrectionist 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
3.3 million yr old fossil of what? not a human, there were no humans that long ago
2006-09-21 16:44:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The very concept of creationism is "My beliefs are right and I ignore science, reality and truth but they contradict what I WANT to be reality." You can't discuss things with people who are convinced they're right no matter what, so don't let it bother you. Just ignore (or pity) the fools.
2006-09-21 16:48:49
·
answer #11
·
answered by auralsects69 2
·
1⤊
1⤋