Given its future damage to our planet, should we penalised the interested denial of man-made Global Warming?

Question

As Holocaust denial is penalised, should the denial of man-made Global Warming be penalised as well? Is it necessary a strong action to stop the damaging influence of this denial in policy-making and public opinion?

Very interesting articles that explain the distorsion of overwhelming scientific evidence by ExxonMobile and its funded institutions as well as the position of scientists on Global Warming:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/oil/story/0,,1876539,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=11

http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1875587,00.html

It is not the Guardian who is saying the man-made Global Warming is the closest it gets to a fact. If you read the first link, you will see that is the Royal Society, which includes about 90 Nobel prize-winners, who is claiming so.

Pops: no offence intended, but don't you think that you are not qualified for such statement?

Answer 1

Yes but it would be difficult to fight global multi-nationals due to the amount of cash they have to produce defence "evidence", buy off people and generally make it so expensive and difficult as to be not worth it.

Many people are trying though, and they deserve a lot more credit than they get.

"don't believe everything you read in the Guardian"

Britian's only real independant national daily, read by more professionals, degree qualified and higher people (though a degree doesn't make you better than anyone else) and has some of the countries best journalists like George Monbiot and Greg Pallast. The Guardian and the FT are the only real newspapers left in the UK, the FT because business people and the rich don't accept lies that are told to the population in the tabloids or the "muslim junkie burglar single mum steals from middle class white person" stories of the Mail and Express.

Answer 2

Only Gore and his old campaign team believe in global warming still. The new movement is we are headed into an ice age. Get with the times. Global warming will occur again in 30 years once the cooling trend stops. And then when the heating trend stops there will be another cry of global cooling. Look back in history and you'll see this has been a liberal battle cry for decades.

You should go clean your dry toilet.

Answer 3

Um, if you're against global warming, what is your stand on the population boom? If each person radiates thermal energy and maintains a body temperature of 98.6, how many people will it take across the face of the earth, until the mean average temperature of the planet is 90 degrees, day and night? Hmm...

Answer 4

Interesting that you quote articles from the Guardian...

If you know anything about the history of the Earth, you would know that the Earth's climate changes ALL THE TIME. Also, volcanoes spew out more CO2 in a single eruption than we have created since the Industrial Revolution. And yet, we're still here despite billions of years of volcanoes.

Answer 5

confident it has grow to be a faith and Al Gore is the pope of the cult.think of of ways lots money specific communities will make off of the hype.think of of all that government money going to "study".to boot there is in user-friendly terms lots you're able to do ,in spite of everything whoever controls the components controls the worldwide.worry is the final political motivator. climate exchange is a factor of the character of the planet.trouble-free experience is to have sparkling potential yet until eventually there's a dollar in all of it that occurs is talk,talk and greater talk.government rules,fines and effects(gotta get that bailout money someplace) We easily want sparkling air and water .i'm the unique recycler and that i do no longer waste potential in simple terms like many human beings.i take advantage of potential and don't choose for the "guilt" holiday of doing so. I extremely have a subject with Gore the guru who flies around a gasoline guzzling jet.So does Queen Pelosi who opted for an even bigger one to fly back and forth to California.bear in strategies her asserting she desires to maintain the planet,yeah she flies we walk.we are able to all start up with the aid of making use of the recent potential saving easy bulbs. Oh I forgot they are those with mercury in them.Oh,properly feels like a stable thought on the time. i assume you all heard that some genius flesh presser had to tax cow farmers for any that own greater suitable than one hundred for emitting "methane gasoline" yeah that's actual.can we bottle it fairly?Or on 2nd thought deliver some from the bull to that flesh presser as he's familiar with the B.S. while he sees or smells it.

Answer 6

The only problem is that lawmakers don't give a rat's *** about global warming.

Answer 7

honestly government repub, lib, or demo only care about money, power and oil. they figure they will be dead before it happens why worry, its sad and it can happen, but nobdy will listen. this may sound crazy but my opinion that the earth is a living organism, what do organism do when they are sick or threatend, try to kill it off, maybe the world is fighting back against us. we pollute it, hope you understand what i am saying and please dont call me a tree hugger

Answer 8

Don't take anything you read in the guardian to seriously

Answer 9

everyone will pay for it sadly

Answer 10

comunism like be , with all same suit and shoes ,,,,,,,,