the bible is proof for those of us who are christians
2006-09-21 09:23:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
actually no. Bible historians are forever claiming they have found proof of events that occured in the bible and then hold this up to be proof that everything in the bible is true. Well it jest aint so . Because a book documents an event that doesn't make everything in that book true. If you want "proof" of that, just read any story that is a dramatization of some event, or watch one on tv, like ABC's path to 9-11. Although the event that this story was about happened( the attack on the the twin towers and pentagon and flight 93) the rest of this show was a farce and a lie, and was presented as a dramatization of real events. So much for proof.
2006-09-21 16:25:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Foundryman 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
The Bible is just an interpretation of the events experienced by the people writing the scrolls. So of course it will reference real life events. Since scientific answers were not available, the writers explained natural disasters, fires and floods the only way they knew how, by attributing these occurrences to a higher being...simple.
2006-09-21 16:28:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
No. I know some stories in the bible are historically accurate BUT you already know which ones we will NEVER buy such as Jonah in the belly of the whale and Noahs ark (not the flood...the ARK).
Besides, the History channel does them better than you can.
2006-09-21 16:24:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lotus Phoenix 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
Well, there are these little distractions we have to get out of the way first, cures for illnesses, nutrition, quantum theory, climatic issues, pollution, genetics, . After that you can be sure we'll get around to everybody's favorite myths - and first come first served!
2006-09-21 16:27:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by JAT 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Kewl
=
2006-09-21 16:25:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Pashur 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Thank you for the link. I have read of Wyatt before but it seems that he is dismissed from both Theists and Atheists alike. The scientific community does not support his work either.
2006-09-21 16:25:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Why don't you do some basic research and see if any of this can be corroborated...oh yeah I forgot, that would be scientific and against your religious beliefs.
Give me a break, none of that stuff has stood up to any serious investigation.
2006-09-21 16:22:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by trouthunter 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
It would be interesting to see some SUPPORTABLE proof. Unfortunately it can't be found at the site you listed.
2006-09-21 16:22:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by toff 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
That does not constitute fact. Anyone can make a museum and put anything in it and claim it as fact.
2006-09-21 16:26:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by genaddt 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
It's bullsh*t. It's obviously not scientific, there's no proof, it's basically a collection of stories with pictures attached.
2006-09-21 16:23:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by rita_alabama 6
·
2⤊
3⤋