they should increase it as well as providing more grants 4 longer 2 students. the average college student takes 6 years for a 4 year degree so they should cover all 6 years 4 students that qualify. seems they only wants students 2 take out loans(that it takes there whole life 2 pay off) or not go 2 college so that they can work in menial low paying jobs.
2006-09-21 09:13:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lady Geo 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
i'm no longer a school student, yet you are able to desire to bypass and ask your instructor or instruct, and so on once you're in school the subsequent. purely ask them what you're able to do to get your EMA back, and who are you able to communicate to approximately getting it backdated, you have been going for the three weeks which you have have been given no longer had any EMA, yet there could desire to be somebody to communicate to on the college you're reading at, and that they are going to be waiting that may assist you get the EMA you're owed backdated, so purely ask your instruct. sturdy success! :) xxxxx
2016-10-17 09:59:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definetly Not. Further education should be elitist.We don`t want all those thick,know nothing,have nothing,aspire to nothing pricks any where near Government. John Prescott ,Blair etc. are a fine example of what happens when you let the monkeys in !!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-09-22 14:52:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by redjonjak 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not for college students. At 16, they do not need to be given money to continue to alevels. I managed to hold down a weekend job and complete my alevels, kids use it as an excuse not to work, its not encouraging them to do well, yes they have to attend, but doesnt mean they are working towards their alevels. They should learn to hold down a job as well as study, they will need to do it later.
2006-09-21 09:40:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Beth 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes ,cos by the time you pay bus fares,box of fags and a sarny your skint
2006-09-21 09:13:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by paul t 4
·
0⤊
2⤋