2006-09-21 09:00:48 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
it's all about the agenda- get enough people to make a noise and get movies and tv shows portraying incest and beastiality as normal and bleeding heart talk show hosts portraying these people as happy and 'misunderstood' and those things will soon be accepted as "okay" too.
Without God, you have no moral standard- it is pointless to argue this with people- we can only speak the truth, live the truth and pray- they will either choose to accept and obey or continue to rebel- it will be between them and God
2006-09-21 09:08:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The law called incest, homosexuals, apples and oranges Wow!
Well the inbreeding thing is ridiculous to bring the European crap , that was an on going practice for decades. today not any one can guarantee mom didn't play around while dad was gone to war or that just because I was born in 1940 that each of my cousins are true bread family. as a matter of fact women who left Europe often had children out of just need .Women crossing the nation adopted new names that might sound more respectable. The women of the west in San Francisco's Barbary coast married freely to most any gold miner with a sack of gold to buy land and for sure she had an elegant or famous name for the deeds and titles.
There is no gene defect today It is just another antiquated law
I have no problem with love your sister in today's society one half is a financial family holdings but not just for sex.
P.S.: Do you dig you cousin? Is it mutual? Good luck just don't tell!
2006-09-21 16:51:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Cousin marriages within a certain degree is socially unacceptable in today's society but was not always so. If one marries too close in degree of family they can genetically breed in the predisposition for genetic illnesses. Marrying outside family lessens that occurrence so thus it became the norm not to marry family.
Homosexual marriage is fine. You are taking usually two genetically unrelated people and they will be no different than any other married couple. There is no difference in the love and respect they feel for their partner than does a heterosexual.
2006-09-21 16:08:24 · answer #3 · answered by genaddt 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I see no comparison of the two at all. Homosexuals are not of the same bloodline nor do they breed. Would you marry your Father, Uncle ,or Brother??? Seems to be that, cousin, would fall into that category. I think that the real argument is breeding within the same family.
2006-09-21 16:27:29 · answer #4 · answered by ABLE 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why do you have such a difficult time with such easy concepts. Marrying your cousin, and having offspring leads to hereditary diseases...it's called inbreeding. The classic example is the hemophilia in the royalty of Europe during the later part of the 1800's.
2006-09-21 16:09:46 · answer #5 · answered by trouthunter 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
These are two very different issues. Like apples and oranges, you can try to compare them but you won't get very far.
Look at the root issues - homosexuality is about two people of the same gender in a loving and/or sexual relationship. "Cousin Marriage" (as you call it), is about marrying within a family, bringing up genetic and incest questions. The only thing these two issues have in common is that they both involve sex.
2006-09-21 16:05:05 · answer #6 · answered by Church Music Girl 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋
You won't end up with retarded children within a homosexual marriage.
I can't believe this actually has to be explained.
2006-09-21 16:30:51 · answer #7 · answered by NightShade 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
thats a good point.
even though "cousin Marriage" will bring retarded children some of the time.
homo sex just spreads disease. and things just dont fit right.
so both are really wrong and kinda gross
2006-09-21 16:37:56 · answer #8 · answered by duh 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yup.
2006-09-21 16:06:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋