English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Pls. answer only if ur interested in Adventure Tours and are ready to take risks for the sake. For 2 points, dont answer this question...

2006-09-21 07:50:52 · 11 answers · asked by Krish 2 in Travel Travel (General) Other - Destinations

11 answers

hell NO

2006-09-21 07:51:48 · answer #1 · answered by ★HigHTƹcH★ 7 · 0 0

I know some people on that tour as we answer questions in yahoo answer.

I've received e-mails and letters full of adventurous details.

They all say they do not want another tour in Iraq.

Therefore, knowing what I know... the answer is no; I will not take a tour to Baghdad, Iraq for a week for any price.

2006-09-21 07:52:58 · answer #2 · answered by Unique 4 · 0 0

There's a difference between Adventure Tours and outright danger. There's no way I would go to Baghdad even if I were to be paid for it. I prefer to avoid bombs and riots and all out war as much as possible.

2006-09-21 07:54:04 · answer #3 · answered by missingora 7 · 0 0

I like adventures but going to a war torn area that hates Americans and is in the midst of killing them and the Americans sometimes suffer "friendly fire" accidents and the place is loaded with depleted uranium somehow even if I was paid to go there I would stay out. I just doesn't seem like a whole lot of fun to me.

2006-09-21 09:55:39 · answer #4 · answered by miss moni 2 · 0 0

For a year, it does no longer be undesirable. i for my section does no longer stay faraway from my kinfolk any further than that. It does no longer be truly really worth the money, you recognize? as far because the threat, it truly is probable well worth it. Civilians are truly secure. in case you in no way leave the camps, then your in reality threat must be from mortar/small fingers/rocket fireplace onto your camp. they don't in many circumstances hit some thing in any respect, they are not aimed truly. in case you bypass on convoys, you face the potential of IEDs. in case you shuttle by making use of helicopter, it truly is safer, yet there is continually the potential of plane malfunction, fantastically in undesirable climate. So ask your ability company how a lot in-united states shuttle is needed. be confident any existence coverage don't have the notorious conflict exclusion clause!

2016-11-23 13:21:32 · answer #5 · answered by rosenberg 4 · 0 0

No. Is the adventure you're referring to here trying not to be kidnapped, tortured and beheaded? No.

IF you're talking about attempting to make a positive difference, then maybe, but for recreation I'm not interested.

2006-09-21 08:00:36 · answer #6 · answered by Isthisnametaken2 6 · 0 0

I would prefer an adventure tour to Kauai.

2006-09-21 08:08:10 · answer #7 · answered by Papa 7 · 0 0

Yea I would go , no point asking Americans , they are afraid of their own shadows now never mind finding Iraq

2006-09-24 11:30:20 · answer #8 · answered by Paul Sabre 4 · 0 0

only if I was feeling extremely adventurous

2006-09-21 07:52:51 · answer #9 · answered by ann.natalie 4 · 0 0

No, I wouldn't go if YOU paid ME

2006-09-21 07:52:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why the **** would anyone wanna go there?

2006-09-21 07:52:23 · answer #11 · answered by digitaldancer22 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers