Up until the time of the great flood, the story of which is found in every culture, what affect would the?

Question

heavy layer of clouds that covered the earth have on solar radiation reaching the planet? Would this in turn affect the radiographic levels used in dating the age of fossils? Yes, some of the dating is also done by how deep they are buried, but remember the flood created a major upheaval on the earth, moving billions of tons of earth.

Also, here's a just suppose question. Could the fossils of the supposedly ancient missing links of man really be the skulls of the children of the fallen angels? They were considered giants, whose tempers were beyond belief. They were a mix of human genes with beings formally made up of energy. I may be wrong, but from what I can tell, these have all been found within 2000 miles of the theorized location of Eden. Granted, this requires some leaps, and I may be wrong about the find locations, but if I'm not. All these decades of seeing these things in museums, maybe we're actually looking at those hybrid beings.

If the great flood was only found in the Bible, than it would only be a Bible story, but it isn't. Every culture, including the American Indians have a stories about it. Surely, they didn't read the Bible before they were forced to by white men.

This game to mind while reading a story in yesterday's paper abnout a newly found skull in northeastern Ethiopia.

Answer 1

Wow, that is some good logic heavy thinking going on. Good possibility. I never have thought about it like that, but you just might be onto something here. Anything is possible.

Answer 2

Not to worry, it has finally been scientifically proven that radio carbon dating an item for age is extremely limited. It can only go back a matter of some thousands of years, not millions.

Anyone telling you that some fossil or bone is millions or billions of years old, simply made the number up. There is no definitive way to actually get a number that high.

What you're talking about is basically what the problem was when they dated the Holy Shroud of Turin. Originally they said it was fake because it only went back to the 15th century or so. Some years later another scientist proved this wrong and that the date arrived at was molecular material on the surface left from a fire in 1532 where the shroud was being kept.

This scientific dating does have some value but it is much like a polygraph too. It simply can not be relied upon as absolute. There are many limitations and variables that come into play to throw it off.

Science has yet to prove God does not exist.

Answer 3

Boy, you REALLY want to believe the bible story, don't you?

Have you ever considered theorizing about things that actually make perfect sense... but don't necessarily support the bible story? The rest of the world does. Give it a try.

Answer 4

OMG you are completely nuts
I still Don't understand why peopel would rather believe a theory that is all gap over one that has a few gaps in it, some one enlighten me.
Christians have yet to prove that god exists

Answer 5

Run with that! You may write the next Harry Potter