But wait!!
I believe pirates are better than ninjas, and i can be very charitable... Do you need my address?
2006-09-21 04:24:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Katy_Kat 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes,
my t-shirt says pirates a way cooler than ninjas.
£ 16.00 + tax, from Jinx.
Religion is so personal, how can all these religions ever agree?
Destined 2 create divisions no matter whether right or wrong.
I believe what I believe & try hard NOT 2 push it on 2 others.
& me, I believe charity begins at home.
2006-09-21 04:26:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What! How dare you! Everyone knows ninjas are better! They are better fighters(frickin ninjas) Better lovers (Kama Sutra) Better dressers(cool ninja outfits) Smell better ( Actually take showers) Helathier (eat fruit more then once a year) Smarter(they don't bury thier treasure)
So as you can see your case for a Pirate loving charity is moot. Donate to the Ninja!
2006-09-21 04:21:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
God loves you no matter what you do, however the path to righteousness is through Jesus. You can't drive toward Florida and expect to be in New York you have to follow the right path. God gives directions and if you follow them you will be in heaven. You should give to charities that believe in your point of view. But you shouldn't make them believe it to get it. You should find what is right and go that way
2006-09-21 04:20:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by leahb1979 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
That may be what you think God does, but you are not God.
God also tells us to help other but not to judge them.
I have a hunch that the question of pirates and ninjas are not specifically addressed in much religious thinking outside the Whitehouse.
2006-09-21 04:20:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Gaspode 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Once again you try to compare yourself and your thinking to God and come up woefully short. The funny thing is how you don't even recognize how far short you fall. This is not unlike Lucifer's own boastful pride.
How odd that you feel that the God Who created the universe as well as you should have to submit to your rules, your whims, your choices instead of the other way around. Very odd indeed.
I suppose that as you travel down he highway you feel as though you should be able to go 125 mph. After all, isn't it unfair that we are free to travel on the road as long as we obey THEIR LAWS. And when we get pulled over we can get fined or even lose our licenses. That is so wrong, isn't it? So what if what we are doing may harm ourselves or others, we're just doing what we think is right for us, aren't we? The world should just adhere to my rules.
As another example, if you are in love with someone your love for them may be unconditional but your relatioinship is always conditional. How? If that person says that they hate you and never wants to see you again, what would you do? Would you stalk them, call them continually, make it so that they had no choice but to be with you? No. You would, most likely, honor their choice and leave them. Isn't this how you demonstrate your love for them? By honoring their desires even if they are not the best thing for them.
God has provided a way for you to inherit eternal life and joy with Him. You are free to reject that way and continue to be separate from Him. As sorrowful as that may make God the decision is up to you and God will honor it.
So don't complain when you die and you find yourself permanently separated from God. That's what you wanted. You wanted to do it your way, under your rules. Well, you'll get that which you have chosen. Seperation from God. In another word.... hell.
Hope this has helped.
2006-09-21 05:01:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bud 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, this is the wrong idea totally. We should always give from our hearts and that does not only include our money, you see if you truly believe and trust in God. You give with a greatful heart, because it is His in the first place.
2006-09-21 04:19:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by papaofgirlmegan 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it isn't what God does. Read the letter that Paul wrote to the Romans in the first century (the first three chapters are most relevant). Paul says it's all about how we treat God and what we deserve as a result.
2006-09-21 04:31:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually you are close. The Bible says that you have to believe that Jesus is raised from the dead and acknowledge his lordship over your life in order to be saved. Just believing He died is not enough. Any other religion is welcome to teach that also. God does not discriminate.
2006-09-21 04:20:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by dewcoons 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
human beings tend to apply the IRS returns to show that conservatives provide better than liberals, yet that records can not be taken interior the uncooked kind. a lot of human beings evaluate giving to a church as "giving to charity" yet religious establishments are no longer required to furnish an accounting on how their donations are used and that they do no longer look to be required to stick to regulations and regulations set forth as charities do. So donations for a church could want for use to construct a radio/television station and not feed the poor. analyze (Chronicle of Philanthropy, "u . s . a . of america’s Generosity Divide", 2012) have shown that liberals and conservatives provide equivalent quantities of funds counting on the area and the tax bracket they stay interior; additionally if the donors are poor, center type or wealthy. The "wealthy" are much less probably to donate mutually as the "center type" provide a miles better quantities. The "poor" donate under all 3, even though it may desire to be seen that they have much less to furnish and generally could desire to maintain what little earnings they could desire to feed their kinfolk, have housing and and to purchase clothing. additionally to contemplate is that if a Blue state purely supplies 3% of their earnings to charity analyze have shown that they actual have a miles better tax bracket and make extra funds so it compares to a pink state who supplies 7% of their earnings yet have a decrease tax bracket and make much less funds. A learn by Rice college, ("Liberals as against conservatives: How politics impacts charitable giving", 2012) shows that counting on what the charity is advertising will confirm if someone donates to the charity. A charity advertising "equality and reducing suffering" could get extra of their funds from liberals mutually as a charity advertising "protecting American values and morals" could get extra donations from conservatives. So in case you provide funds to a charity which "promotes christian values and morals" and then they use the money handy out bibles, is that comparable to a charity which "builds residences for the poor"? What approximately for charities which "help animals", "shop the rain wooded area", "shop old movies"? What are we actually speaking approximately as quickly as we use the be conscious "charity"? So what that charity is advertising has no longer been accounted for interior the myth that one social gathering/ideology supplies better than the different. The jury continues to be out and that i do no longer believe anybody can lay declare to "giving extra" to charity.
2016-10-17 09:36:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋