i'm all about the quickest solution or end. whatever completes the task most efficiently. they're still making threats (i like the one about the pope should convert to islam, or else) so we obviously haven't gotten the point across.
and, the whole american's wouldn't be getting killed if they weren't over there is b.s. if you really believe that live and let live would work with these people, you're an idiot. not everyone in the world thinks in humane thoughts. or are people really suggesting we kiss islam's *ss so we don't upset the muslims, they don't terrorize us, and we won't have to go to war? how much should we compromise, how far should we roll over? is it worth surrenduring so long as we can avoid a war? how can people think that we're being attacked because we're stepping on toes? then, when something happens, like a tsunami, we're expected to step in and intervene, well....the rest of the world doesn't dictate what america does, sorry.
2006-09-21 02:50:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by practicalwizard 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
The USA and The Western World Know exactly what they are supposed to do, but :-
1 Invisible Shackles have Binded them
2 Wrong Idelogies have Confused them
3 They have become some what Compromised after WW2.
But still they have an Armour and Weapons of God(purely emphasising on their Military Superiority)If they do not use it in subsequent years then it may not posess the ability to Lift the Armour as well as Use the Weapons afterwards because with every day and passing of time Satanic Ideology which Breeds Terrorism is Growing and Western Worlds Population is Agening.
PS : I wish that the Western World Win & Prevail.
2006-09-21 04:48:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iraq gave up a long time ago. And we captured Saddam, what, two years ago? All of the fighting and bombing going on in Iraq now is being carried out by militant foreign nationals from other countries who are sneaking arcross the border from Iran, Syria, Pakistan, Jordan and other countries. So what's your solution, bomb the entire middle east? You ever think that maybe Americans wouldn't be getting killed if they weren't over there?
2006-09-21 02:46:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by badkitty1969 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
the answer is truly basic. authorities is the in reality section the position failure isn't punished, that's rewarded. Had the protection failure been the end results of the airways (who're truly to blame for the protection of passengers, no longer authorities), someone ought to were fired, and likely arrested if criminal negligence led to deaths or damage). yet at the same time as authorities fails, they call for and get more advantageous money, and bigger means. it really is the historic past of the time-honored public faculties. because they are run by making use of authorities, there is not any competition. money isn't a aspect. after all, it truly is taxpayers' money. The taxpayers pay, and the politicians administration. the end result, and truly severe priced provider that promises a poor product. shuttle protection is yet another celebration. the protection of the passengers is the pastime of the provider. at the same time as authorities receives in touch, we may be able to assume tremendous fee, abuse of our freedoms, and failure. Get authorities out of the airline protection company. Abolish the TSA.
2016-11-23 12:50:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by wanamaker 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
WOW a little extreme Please do me a favor and don't make up Uneducated questions and or comments until you know what you are talking about.
Now don't get me wrong I LOVE BUSH I LOVE OUR TROOPS but we are winning this war my best friend spent a year over there we are winning! It's just taking longer then we would like.
But really here is the thing You can't just go over there and just blow it all up. Not every one there is a bad guy! But it's the old rotten apple analogy. You need to learn patience. ( I know it sucks)
Well God bless
PS Jessy Jackson
Yah leaflets that worked so well in Japan didn't it???
2006-09-21 03:15:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by kwingfan13 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
What exactly did Iraq do again? Oh yeah, they had weapons of mass destruction - except they didn't have those in the end did they? Ok so we went in for regeime change. Which means getting rid of Sadam Hussein and his government. His GOVERNMENT. Not the people of Iraq who didn't actually have anything to do with Hussein - who was brought to power by a CIA backed coup.
If you believe all Iraqis must die because of the actions of a few, then it is presumably very easy for you to understand the mentality of the terrorists who believe all Americans must die because of the actions of a few. The way to win a war is to take the war away, not to kill every single person who dares to resist. If (for instance) China invaded the US you would resist wouldn't you? You wouldn't say "oh, fair enough, you've got us" and submit to Chinese rule. So using your ideology China would be PERFECTLY justified to level every single US city until only the people who supported them were left. Sound about right to you?
2006-09-21 02:53:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mordent 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think we already did the bombing thing......we are now trying to rebuild what we destroyed not make it even worse. Keep in mind that a large majority of people over there are like you and me, just average people trying to work and raise our families, it doesn't seem right that they should eat bombs for that. Our boys are doing something heroic and a lot of them believe in the cause for the Iraqi civilian population. War is hell and people get killed and that is the price we pay for doing what we are. Remember no good deed goes unpunished.
2006-09-21 03:29:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by jerofjungle 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
What about the US troops that are in Iraq ? They would be bombed also. Who should give up, you don't even know who are the terrorists.
But think about this :
you pretend that you are the land of freedom, that you liberated a country from a dictator AND that the US stands for all what is right.
With your "solution" you would not be better than the Nazis or Communists. Did your fathers fight for that in WWII ? I dought it !
2006-09-21 04:51:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Rik 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes but that would be over doing it just take like a bunch of troops into iraq and place explosives in major caves(or houses that he might be hiding in >.< that fag should die god terrorist should ggive upall to gether becous there was hitler he ommitted suicide now theres ben osama and bin laden and they both losing so if ur a terrorist
(person reading this) just give up and dont commite suicice look at the odds all ur major leads got pummled by the us :D besides u can take 20 people out of our population(that weould suck tho) but we would charge u guys with like 1 million military units think blowin ur selves up is worth that and futher to the question i agree them iraqies are insane chalenging the woulds best navy :) and contry with most money and were allied with the best armie in the world the britishand im preety sure we could bomb the **** out of iraw but who would want a contry covvered in atomic waste? i mean just like 10thousand guys smarching should do it but thats just my thought but we wouldnt be able to bomb 24-7 becouse they do have some flak and we have guys down there plus it would xost way to much
2006-09-21 02:57:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Does everyone realize during our Home Land Security it is illegal to threaten terrorist acts towards the United States? If someone knocks on your door, I do not know you at all.
No more bombing than absolutely necessary, let our valiant troops take care of it until they can take care of themselves.
We are staying with the original plan.
2006-09-21 04:02:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
0⤊
1⤋