Are the Democrats just lucky, that the Republicans always seem to be the ones in power when we lose our wars?
2006-09-21 02:07:59 · 13 answers · asked by Davie 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Well, Lincoln was a republican, and the republicans were in power during the Civil War, so we don't always lose our wars when republicans are in charge.
2006-09-21 02:16:22 · answer #1 · answered by Big_Drew 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
As the terrorists said themselves, they will when the war in Iraq because Americans can't stomach it. Meaning if we were to stay our course, we would win, but everyone knows that the liberals won't allow that from happening. Same thing with Vietnam, liberal masses. The fact the Chavez holds up liberal rhetoric at the UN saying this is a great book that gave explains how America is evil tells me that the liberals in this country are very effective at giving hope to our enemies.
2006-09-21 02:12:27 · answer #2 · answered by AT 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Operation Desert Storm?
US Civil War?
2006-09-21 02:17:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
quite, we lost Iraq? whilst replaced into this peace contract reached? Hmmm, what relating to the 1st Gulf conflict, aka wilderness typhoon? weren't the Democrats in fee whilst the conflict in Vietnam replaced into escalated into the Vietnam conflict? Wait, what relating to the Korean conflict? Wasn't Truman in fee? Oh wait, Eisenhower replaced into elected in 'fifty two. The Korean conflict replaced into declared extra of a draw, despite if i believe a lot of human beings reffered to the Korean conflict simply by fact the Korean conflict or a Police action. enable's see FDR and Truman in the time of WWII. Yep, they have been the two Democrats. Who replaced into President in the time of WWI? What replaced into his political association? Hmmm, Lincoln replaced right into a Republican and President for the time of the Civil conflict. We won that one did no longer we? properly i think once you're from the South you lost, yet what replaced into Jefferson Davis' political association? perhaps next time you are able to desire to do somewhat analyze earlier hitting the enter key... purely a concept.
2016-10-17 09:28:54 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vietnam was not a war. The police action was started by Kennedy, a Dem. It was continued and escalated by Johnson, another Dem. It was recognized as a futile mistake by Nixon, a Repub. who got elected because the Dems had messed up Vietnam so badly.
Iraq is not over or lost by any means. Time will tell.
2006-09-21 02:12:45 · answer #5 · answered by Michael 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because the democrats begin playing a power struggle the minute republicans come into office. The republicans are so caught up in red tape their hands are basically tied.
2006-09-21 02:10:25 · answer #6 · answered by Venus M 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, they just have the uncanny need to police the entire world, then when they actually try to do something they figure out that the enemy is smarter than they are. Democrats, on the other hand, know how to min their own business.
To Him
v v v v
Yes sure, we REALLY should have stayed in Vietnam, where the enemy had vastly superior knowledge of the terrain, supplies, and skill. Vietnam is an embarassment to our country, we never should have gotten involved in that mess.
2006-09-21 02:11:21 · answer #7 · answered by Shinkirou Hasukage 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
First of all we didnt LOSE the Vietnam war, we were there to stop the spread of comminism. Is it a communist state today?
2006-09-21 02:15:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree with your first answerer go to the politics forum could be a couple or more VVs! there..........
Good Luck.
Now would be a good time to hold my tounge.
Peace*
2006-09-21 02:40:10 · answer #9 · answered by flowerpower 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ugh.... I think if you look at the 1st gulf war, Bush senior handed Sadam his A@@ on a platter to him. I'd say we won that one. Micheal your right on the money.
2006-09-21 02:15:54 · answer #10 · answered by Charles B 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋