17 people hijack planes and kill thousands of people in the US on 9/11...?

Question

17 people hijack planes and kill thousands of people in the US on 9/11. It was intentional and driven by their religious, god fearing mindset. They were seeking eternal salvation from the same god you do, the god of Abraham.

Now tell me how much you respect their "differences"?

Answer 1

I'm sorry but your ststement is incorrect. The government theory is that 19 Arabs, who had been under surveillance, conspired together, walked onto four commercial aircraft without being detected, and without having their names appear on a passenger list. Then that they overcame over 250 people with plastic box-cutters. And not only that, but with no previous experience of flying large jets, they navigated from 30,000 feet and hit three out of four targets precisely, meantime conducting flying manoeuvres that fighter pilots would find difficult. Then, the amazing thing is that 7 of them survived the events and are known to be alive today.
Also for the first time ever in history, three, not two, but three steel framed buildings collapsed as a result of fire which could not possibly have burned hot enough to melt steel, and caused the buildings not to topple over, as one might expect, or to fall a little at a time, but to fall within their own footprint at the speed of gravity. And one of those buildings (WTC7) was not even hit by a plane.
Not only that, but the four aircraft disappeared completely without a trace of their 16 large engines, or any of the black boxes. This has also never before happened in history.


This theory is so amazingly full of holes that it is impossible for any sane thinking person to believe, yet that is what the official 9/11 commission report.says.


"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
-- William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting, 1981)


All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer

If you would like a logical explanation of waht happened see below.

Answer 2

Because it's not fully representative of Islam as a whole, but the extremists will always make the headlines first. I can easily generalize Christians for the Crusades, the Inquisition, and the "troubles" in Northern Ireland, or generalize Germans for the Holocaust, or any other group based on the actions of a few radicals, vs. the overall group.

For what it's worth, the death toll of 9-11 (excluding hijackers) was 2973. That's tragic, yes, but still small compared to the thousands -- millions in the case of the Holocaust -- who've died in the above-listed events, and now even less than the number of American personnel killed in our "action" in Iraq.

Answer 3

as long as there are human soul.. i do respect to them.

http://www.brassche ck.com/videos/ 911/911mysteries .html

If you doubt the value of 9/11 research, please read the following:

I've received more mail about and had more viewings of "The Science of 9/11" than any film I've posted since starting BrasscheckTV. com

Some of the mail has been critical.

Some have asked why with everything going on in the world I would "waste time" on "nut job conspiracies. "

First, September 11 is the root of many of the evils we are facing today.

Take away the official 9/11 story and

1. George Bush and his colleagues are out of office,
2. There would have been no Iraq invasion,
3. Israel would have been restrained from its recent slaughter of Lebanese civilians
4. Civil liberties in the US (such as they are) would be intact
5. Our economy would not have been bled of nearly $1 trillion in "Terror War" and Iraq invasion waste and fraud

I'd say these things make September 11 a subject worthy of the most exhaustive study.

That's my first point.

My second point is that it is a plain fact is that no one has ever proven that Osama bin Laden or the mythical, all-powerful al Qaeda are responsible for 9/11.

No court accepted evidence has ever been presented, there have been no formal charges, no arrests, no trials, no convictions. No nothing.

On 9/11, Katie Couric and other millionaire newscaster know-nothings declared based on "unnamed intelligence sources" that Osama bin Laden did it and that has been the
full extent of the reporting.

Not only that, but thanks to the anthrax attacks which took place in late 2001, the FBI - at the order of President Bush - suspended all investigations into the 9/11 attacks - and have never resumed them.

In other words, no one knows anything for sure about what happened on 9/11 other than these two facts:

1. Thousands of innocent people were murdered in cold blood

and

2. Practically NOTHING that the government presented about what happened that day has turned out to be true.

The government said they had no warnings...

There received all kinds of warnings including one literally put on the President's desk in August of 2000.

The government said there was no time to activate air defense...

There was all the time in the world to activate air defense.

The government said they know the identifies of all the alleged hijackers (and thus their affiliations) ...

Nearly half of the people they identified are alive and well and had nothing to do with 9/11.

This does not inspire confidence, nor does the fact that key witnesses have been ignored (and
in some cases silenced) and key evidence from the World Trade Center and the Pentagon has
been withheld from public view.

Given that the facts of this important case have been actively distorted and evidence willfully
withheld, I consider the research of the so called "nut jobs" to be nothing less than heroic.

Is all their work 100% professional in every case?

Of course not.

But where *are* the professionals?

* Why did Bush take the FBI off the 9/11 case in late 2001?
* Why have the CIA and US military stopped looking for Osama bin Laden?
* How, assuming Bin Laden is even alive, has he managed to elude capture for FIVE years?

Where is the US news media?

And where is the so called Left Media and the investigative reporters who've previously done so much courageous work and analysis over the years?

With few exceptions (like the stalwarts at the Pacifica Network), the Left has ignored
the issue entirely.

Yes, it's true that the leadership on this issue comes mainly from people with nothing to lose - young people without fixed careers, tenured and retired academics, writers who've made a career of studying government conspiracies - but that's because at the present time, no one else has had the guts and the uncorrupted intelligence to look at the facts and speak the truth about them.

I've come across a brand new film that addresses the science of 9/11 and handles it even
better than the previous film I just posted on this subject.

I didn't abdridge this one because there was no need to.

It's an hour and a half long - and every minute counts. It's called "9/11 Mysteries."

It's worthy of your serious attention.

http://www.brassche ck.com/videos/ 911/911mysteries .html

- Brasscheck

P.S. Thanks to your sharing of this information, the number of subscribers to BrasscheckTV. com has increased over tenfold in the past seven weeks.

A list of all films available for free online viewing is at:

http://www.brassche cktv.com

Answer 4

There was usual technique for coping with terrorists hijacking an plane. It was that they could make demands and then those on the plane could be secure from harm if the demands have been met or the hijackers have been taken out or they gave themselves up. there replaced into in no way a inspite of the incontrovertible fact that that 9/11 could desire to quite happen the way it did. there replaced into the theory that it can be a common hijacking. Now that has replaced. there is not any longer yet another hijacking like that back, extremely, worse case undertaking right here, we can finally end up with extra Flight ninety 3's. additionally the homes have been built with trusses. firefighters say, in no way believe the trusses. Trusses are good, yet they can furnish into warmth extra constructive. additionally, there replaced into a selection of of warmth and a selection of of gas. in accordance to a pair human beings, they in no way heard of scouse borrow being melted earlier (a View hostess a mutually as back) yet they forget that scouse borrow is formed by hearth and changed by hearth. there replaced into additionally asbestos used as insulation. it extremely is sturdy insulation, yet dealing in that it burns warm and perplexing and is likewise undesirable to respire in. the invention Channel and the historic past Channel (besides as different channels affiliated with them) teach specials on the form (and destruction) of the twin Towers. you are able to look those issues up on their internet site, yet in addition, the specials could desire to be displaying sometime interior the arriving week considering it extremely is the seventh anniversary of that incident. you additionally can seek for "9/11 television Specials" and you gets listings on it. Many specials could desire to be displaying this coming week. desire this helps!

Answer 5

It's not the same God, just because they use the same name or appeal to Abraham. If I talked about Sara and I described you as something completely the opposite of what you are it would be incorrect to think that it's really the same person just because I used the same name. They do not worship the same God, they do not worship the God of Abraham. And I have no respect for our differences, I feel sorry for the Muslim people and the false doctrine that has enslaved them.

Answer 6

I think we should separate the religious issue in the topic. Those hiJackers did not do it for the religion reason. One of the guy went to strip club which is forbidden by his religion. And these hijacker were killing the innocent flight attentent and pilots. That is also violating their religous belief.

These people are using the "holy war" and reglion to lobby for support and money. They want to have an excuse to convince others to join them and praise them.

Answer 7

If you believe, that the most defensive country can allow such an attack you have to be kidding, at MOST only one plane should have hit the towers. Why was Norad called down? Why were planes allowed to hit the second tower and the pentagon (which is the most unsecret defended building in the world) Why weren't they shot down??

I mean, why did the towers even collapse for that matter? or tower 7 collapse? Anyway i hope you find your answers.

Answer 8

okay first of all get off your high horse, thinking your the only that hates what happened on 9/11, but you can't group an entire religion on a group of crazy extremists that did an aful thing. Thats like saying all caucasians are KKK members. I don't respect the "differences" of terrorists and obviously i don't agree with it, but i can respect muslims that are not in any related to terrorism.

Answer 9

heir religious, god fearing mindset.

NOPE! allah fearing mind set


hey were seeking eternal salvation from the same god you do, the god of Abraham.

NO! Different god!

Who respects moon god worshipers? Not I .

Answer 10

it wasn't 17 it was 19 hijackers in 9/11, 4 planes were hijacked
2 crashed in the world trade center in ny, the 3rd plane crashed into the pentagon in pennsylvania, and the 4th one was ment to crash into the white house but it crashed into a field.