English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Christianity is an abomination to our god, and I solely believe that law is between a non-Christian and a non-Christian. Thoughts?


Now do you see how detrimental this train of thought is?

2006-09-20 16:53:45 · 31 answers · asked by valkyrie hero 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

no, I'm not homosexual.

2006-09-20 16:54:43 · update #1

also, this is targeted only towards Christians pushing homosexual marriage laws.

2006-09-20 16:56:13 · update #2

I do not seriously think of pulling this off, this is a hypothetical civilization.

2006-09-20 16:57:30 · update #3

that shouldn't say civilization, I'm multi-tasking and writing a summary on meso-american civilizations. It should instead say situation.

2006-09-20 17:00:59 · update #4

Ok, my point in this entire question, which is already jumbled with details, is that to discriminate against one section of people is wrong. Homosexuals or Christians. And I wanted to show the effects or feelings caused if I turned the tables on the Christians, see?

2006-09-20 17:05:42 · update #5

Well Martin, unless you're willing to tolerate a teacher telling your children homosexuality is a perfectly fine lifestyle then you should be willing to give up your equal share in his balance.

2006-09-20 17:07:24 · update #6

31 answers

wrong,
Why not put it this way,
If any group or club has requirements for membership, And you disagree with the requirements, why would you want to be a part of that group?

2006-09-20 16:56:03 · answer #1 · answered by Tim 47 7 · 2 0

Hypothetical or not did you know that in Europe and Canada Christian teachers are being arrested for saying what the Bible says about homosexuality because it violates hate speech laws? You might have been making a joke, but if this trend continues who knows what further legal restrictions will be placed on Christianity in the name of secular humanistic beliefs.

2006-09-20 17:01:09 · answer #2 · answered by Martin S 7 · 1 0

Whatever.

Dude, everyone has their ideas of what is best for all. At this moment in time, in the USA christian values are the foundation of our laws (so homosexuals are azzed out).

If in the next few years seculars rule the USA, then guess what? homosexuals probably will be accepted as just another group of people.

So if you dont like the current state of affairs, just wait a millennium or three.

Remember, those who rule get to impose and set policy

2006-09-20 17:03:27 · answer #3 · answered by viajero_intergalactico 6 · 1 0

Christianity is NOT an abomination to our God. Christianity is about YOUR personal relationship with God. There are different demoninations of Christians. Obviously, people in here do not know that. We believe in the basic principal that Jesus died on the cross for our sins and that we will continue to sin. However, Penecostal, Southern Baptist, Baptist, etc. study the bible and their futher beliefs are different. I am a Christian, and have many homosexual friends. Do I agree? Does it matter? You are judged by your relationship with Him and your faith.

2006-09-20 17:02:56 · answer #4 · answered by naughty_mattress_monkey 4 · 0 0

The funny thing about america is that separation of church and state is not where it should be. Marriage is a legally binding contrac,t but is based on christianity. One thing that really pisses me of is when people have tunnel vision towards god. There are many thousands of interpreutations of god. Why do people not seperate christ from god? Why do people assume that when you say god, you are talking of the christian god. Think for yourself and have an open mind.

2006-09-20 17:02:14 · answer #5 · answered by jason 2 · 0 0

I am sorry, I miss your point. You and I usually agree so maybe you can see why I am confused. If you are saying that it would be detrimental to make Christianity illegal, than I agree. No religion should be made illegal. I do not agree with most of their beliefs but I will defend their legal right to have them. Am I anywhere in the ballpark of your question?

2006-09-20 17:00:03 · answer #6 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 1 0

Look, your problem is most every body hates a fag, and your just pissed of because you don't have any thing to whine about, so why not go for the Christan's because they are telling the truth and you know it or why would it bother you what they think. GET A LIFE AND A WOMEN and maybe you'll stay away from the butt hole.

2006-09-20 17:22:28 · answer #7 · answered by milkman11377 1 · 0 0

That train of thought is just silly and goes to explain why there is so much hate on both sides. If ever we could get to a point of live and let live, we'd be so much happier as a society. I'm an optimist, and I still hope that one day we will.

2006-09-20 17:01:51 · answer #8 · answered by Jerrysberries 4 · 0 0

the unique formula of yankee fundamentalist ideals could be traced to the Niagara Bible convention (1878–1897) and, in 1910, to the known assembly of the Presbyterian Church which distilled those into what grew to become ordinary simply by fact the "5 fundamentals"[3]: Inerrancy of the Scriptures The virgin delivery and the deity of Jesus The doctrine of substitutionary atonement by God's grace and human faith The actual resurrection of Jesus The authenticity of Christ's miracles (or, on the different hand, his premillennial 2d coming)[4] in specific, fundamentalists reject the documentary hypothesis—the theory held by bigger biblical criticism that the Pentateuch replaced into composed and formed by a lot of human beings over the centuries. Fundamentalists assert that Moses replaced into the widespread author of the 1st 5 books of the old testomony. some fundamentalists, on the different hand, may be prepared to contemplate option authorship purely the place the Biblical text cloth would not specify an author, insisting that books wherein the author is pointed out could desire to have been written by that author. Fundamentalists selection from Pentecostals of their good insistence upon "impressive" doctrine and a selection of of times recommend separatism (which in many situations additionally divides fundamentalists from one yet another) as adversarial to the experiential emphasis of Pentecostals. Fundamentalists additionally criticize evangelicals for a loss of undertaking for doctrinal purity and for a loss of discernment in ecumenical endeavors in working cooperatively with different Christians of differing doctrinal perspectives, even inspite of the incontrovertible fact that some fundamentalists were accused by their critics for doing a similar (esp. embracing doctrines inclusive of dispensationalism, King James Onlyism, the rapture, and so on. that critics argue have not any biblical foundation). American evangelist Billy Graham got here from a fundamentalist historic past, yet many Christian fundamentalists repudiate him today simply by fact of his selection, early in his ministry (Nineteen Fifties), to co-perform with different Christians. He represents a stream that arose interior fundamentalism, yet has increasingly extra become distinctive from it, ordinary as Neo-evangelicalism or New Evangelicalism (a term coined by Harold J. Ockenga, the "Father of latest Evangelicalism").

2016-10-17 09:09:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not good reasoning. Religious belief is not a sexual choice or belief. Many gays Love religion. Why are all religious views so superficial & one-sided?

2006-09-20 16:56:19 · answer #10 · answered by Bronweyn 3 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers